Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts

• Regional near-zero steel decarbonization pathways are combined into a global picture. • Scenarios show that nearly 30% of crude steel is produced with green iron in 2050. • Green iron can be produced in global “sweet spots” and transported overseas with low costs. • 15-26 Mt/a of hydrogen consumption can be relocated to global sweet spots for green iron export • 2.2-3.9% of global annual production costs can be saved through a global green iron trade. The currently most promising approach for reducing CO 2 emissions of the global steel production is reducing iron ore in shaft furnaces with (green) hydrogen instead of blast furnaces. Unlike to the liquid iron produced in blast furnaces, the direct reduced iron produced in this route (green iron) exists in a solid state and can be transported at reasonable costs over long distances. This allows for spatial decoupling of the iron reduction step from the steelmaking step and may lead to global trade in green iron as a new intermediate product in the steelmaking value chain. This article assesses the potential impact of a global green iron trade in terms of shifting energy demand between regions and in terms of cost savings by comparing three scenarios for a global near-zero GHG steel industry: The Domestic scenario, assuming strict regional co-location of green iron and steel production; The Max Trade scenario, assuming early emergence of a global green iron market and the Intermediate Trade scenario, assuming late emergence of a global green iron market. In the trade scenarios, 12-21% of global crude steel is produced from traded green iron in 2050. 15-26 Mt/a of hydrogen consumption is relocated to global “sweet spots”, resulting in cost savings of 2.2-3.9% of the global annual steel production costs, which can provide important support for the development of net zero steel production. Enablers and barriers for global green iron trade are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Climate Change
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100161
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts

Stefan Kronshage, Annika Tönjes, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Stefan Lechtenböhmer et al.
11 citations
Energy and Climate Change
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
2.34
article

Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts

Stefan Kronshage, Annika Tönjes, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Stefan Lechtenböhmer, Ole Zelt, Hilton Trollip, Georg Holtz, Süheyb Bilici, Andreas Meurer, Alexander Jülich, Robin König, Zhenxi Li, Bryce Mc Call
article en
11 citations

Abstract

• Regional near-zero steel decarbonization pathways are combined into a global picture. • Scenarios show that nearly 30% of crude steel is produced with green iron in 2050. • Green iron can be produced in global “sweet spots” and transported overseas with low costs. • 15-26 Mt/a of hydrogen consumption can be relocated to global sweet spots for green iron export • 2.2-3.9% of global annual production costs can be saved through a global green iron trade. The currently most promising approach for reducing CO 2 emissions of the global steel production is reducing iron ore in shaft furnaces with (green) hydrogen instead of blast furnaces. Unlike to the liquid iron produced in blast furnaces, the direct reduced iron produced in this route (green iron) exists in a solid state and can be transported at reasonable costs over long distances. This allows for spatial decoupling of the iron reduction step from the steelmaking step and may lead to global trade in green iron as a new intermediate product in the steelmaking value chain. This article assesses the potential impact of a global green iron trade in terms of shifting energy demand between regions and in terms of cost savings by comparing three scenarios for a global near-zero GHG steel industry: The Domestic scenario, assuming strict regional co-location of green iron and steel production; The Max Trade scenario, assuming early emergence of a global green iron market and the Intermediate Trade scenario, assuming late emergence of a global green iron market. In the trade scenarios, 12-21% of global crude steel is produced from traded green iron in 2050. 15-26 Mt/a of hydrogen consumption is relocated to global “sweet spots”, resulting in cost savings of 2.2-3.9% of the global annual steel production costs, which can provide important support for the development of net zero steel production. Enablers and barriers for global green iron trade are discussed.

Energy and Climate ChangeVol. 5
University of Kassel (DE), Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IN), University of Cape Town (ZA), Lund University (SE), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Horizon 2020
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.