A comparative study on machine learning approaches for rock mass classification using drilling data

Current rock engineering design in drill and blast tunnelling primarily relies on engineers' observational assessments. Measure While Drilling (MWD) data, a high-resolution sensor dataset collected during tunnel excavation, is underutilised, mainly serving for geological visualisation. This study aims to automate the translation of MWD data into actionable metrics for rock engineering. It seeks to link data to specific engineering actions, thus providing critical decision support for geological challenges ahead of the tunnel face. Leveraging a large and geologically diverse dataset of ∼500,000 drillholes from 15 tunnels, the research introduces models for accurate rock mass quality classification in a real-world tunnelling context. Both conventional machine learning and image-based deep learning are explored to classify MWD data into Q-classes and Q-values—examples of metrics describing the stability of the rock mass—using both tabular- and image data. The results indicate that the K-nearest neighbours algorithm in an ensemble with tree-based models using tabular data effectively classifies rock mass quality. It achieves a cross-validated balanced accuracy of 0.86 in classifying rock mass into the Q-classes A, B, C, D, E1, E2, and 0.95 for a binary classification with E versus the rest. Classification using a CNN with MWD-images for each blasting round resulted in a balanced accuracy of 0.82 for binary classification. Regressing the Q-value from tabular MWD-data achieved cross-validated R 2 and MSE scores of 0.80 and 0.18 for a similar ensemble model as in classification. High performance in regression and classification boosts confidence in automated rock mass assessment. Applying advanced modelling on a unique dataset demonstrates MWD data's value in improving rock mass classification accuracy and advancing data-driven rock engineering design, reducing manual intervention. • Rock mass quality from MWD data in tunnelling is classified using machine learning • A big dataset spanning 15 tunnels, with ∼500 000 drillholes, boosts model reliability • The research compares and analyses three model approaches comprehensively • The models predict Q-class and Q-value as examples of rock mass quality metrics • A tabular-dataset-based ensemble model outperforms image-based CNN models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2024.100199
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on machine learning approaches for rock mass classification using drilling data

Georg H. Erharter, Jim Tørresen, Tom F. Hansen, Zhongqiang Liu
14 citations
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.70
article

A comparative study on machine learning approaches for rock mass classification using drilling data

Georg H. Erharter, Jim Tørresen, Tom F. Hansen, Zhongqiang Liu
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Current rock engineering design in drill and blast tunnelling primarily relies on engineers' observational assessments. Measure While Drilling (MWD) data, a high-resolution sensor dataset collected during tunnel excavation, is underutilised, mainly serving for geological visualisation. This study aims to automate the translation of MWD data into actionable metrics for rock engineering. It seeks to link data to specific engineering actions, thus providing critical decision support for geological challenges ahead of the tunnel face. Leveraging a large and geologically diverse dataset of ∼500,000 drillholes from 15 tunnels, the research introduces models for accurate rock mass quality classification in a real-world tunnelling context. Both conventional machine learning and image-based deep learning are explored to classify MWD data into Q-classes and Q-values—examples of metrics describing the stability of the rock mass—using both tabular- and image data. The results indicate that the K-nearest neighbours algorithm in an ensemble with tree-based models using tabular data effectively classifies rock mass quality. It achieves a cross-validated balanced accuracy of 0.86 in classifying rock mass into the Q-classes A, B, C, D, E1, E2, and 0.95 for a binary classification with E versus the rest. Classification using a CNN with MWD-images for each blasting round resulted in a balanced accuracy of 0.82 for binary classification. Regressing the Q-value from tabular MWD-data achieved cross-validated R 2 and MSE scores of 0.80 and 0.18 for a similar ensemble model as in classification. High performance in regression and classification boosts confidence in automated rock mass assessment. Applying advanced modelling on a unique dataset demonstrates MWD data's value in improving rock mass classification accuracy and advancing data-driven rock engineering design, reducing manual intervention. • Rock mass quality from MWD data in tunnelling is classified using machine learning • A big dataset spanning 15 tunnels, with ∼500 000 drillholes, boosts model reliability • The research compares and analyses three model approaches comprehensively • The models predict Q-class and Q-value as examples of rock mass quality metrics • A tabular-dataset-based ensemble model outperforms image-based CNN models

Applied Computing and GeosciencesVol. 24
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO), University of Oslo (NO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Drilling and Well Engineering
4.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.