The Deceptive Reassurance of a “Negative” Test – A Difficult Case Highlighting the BioFire<sup>©</sup> Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Medical Heuristics

<b>Purpose:</b> Neurolisteriosis is a difficult neurologic infectious disease to diagnose. Here, we present a case in which the diagnosis was suspected, but repeated testing for the pathogen was negative. Ultimately the diagnosis was made after the patient iatrogenically worsened. <b>Results:</b> This prompted an investigation into the widely used diagnostic test, the BioFire© Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel. Although the company reports high sensitivities and specificities for the panel, real world studies have demonstrated insufficient evidence that all 14 pathogens tested on the panel have similar results. <b>Conclusion:</b> This case is a reminder of the heuristics involved in medicine and how with every medical advancement, clinicians should always go back to the fundamentals of history-taking and physical examinations to ensure no steps have been overlooked in the diagnosis and management of challenging cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Neurohospitalist
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241290274
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Deceptive Reassurance of a “Negative” Test – A Difficult Case Highlighting the BioFire© Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Medical Heuristics

Hai Ethan Hoang
The Neurohospitalist
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
article

The Deceptive Reassurance of a “Negative” Test – A Difficult Case Highlighting the BioFire© Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Medical Heuristics

Hai Ethan Hoang
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> Neurolisteriosis is a difficult neurologic infectious disease to diagnose. Here, we present a case in which the diagnosis was suspected, but repeated testing for the pathogen was negative. Ultimately the diagnosis was made after the patient iatrogenically worsened. <b>Results:</b> This prompted an investigation into the widely used diagnostic test, the BioFire© Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel. Although the company reports high sensitivities and specificities for the panel, real world studies have demonstrated insufficient evidence that all 14 pathogens tested on the panel have similar results. <b>Conclusion:</b> This case is a reminder of the heuristics involved in medicine and how with every medical advancement, clinicians should always go back to the fundamentals of history-taking and physical examinations to ensure no steps have been overlooked in the diagnosis and management of challenging cases.

The NeurohospitalistVol. 15(2)
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Deceptive Reassurance of a “Negative” Test – A Difficult Case Highlighting the BioFire<sup>©</sup> Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Medical Heuristics — Hai Ethan Hoang · The Neurohospitalist (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS