An updated multi-criteria decision-making method for the sustainable renovation of buildings including environmental, economic and social life-cycle metrics

The ambitious targets of carbon emission reduction set worldwide for the coming years entail the commitment of structural engineers towards the sustainable renovation of existing buildings. The life cycle thinking (LCT) approach offers a holistic perspective for the design of sustainable retrofitting strategies. It envisages the reduction of the environmental impact at all building life cycle phases, while also addressing economic and social issues. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches support the choice of optimal retrofitting solutions, thus being relevant tools for boosting the actual adoption of LCT in current practices. In this study, a previously proposed MCDM approach is enriched with additional LCT-inspired decision parameters (module D beyond-life impacts, environmental payback period, invasiveness), and is then scrutinised and discussed through its application to a case-study building. Four integrated retrofitting scenarios are investigated using state-of-art seismic loss and energy performance assessment methods, including four different types of exoskeletons, made of timber, steel, and concrete. The end-to-end integrated assessment shows that the inclusion of additional LCT-inspired decision criteria effectively favours LCT-based retrofitting interventions over more traditional ones. • Life Cycle Thinking as a holistic appoach for retrofitting of buildings • Use of a MCDM procedures to identify optimal retrofitting strategies • Consideration of environmental, economic, and social criteria • Application to a case-study building, retrofitted with four types of exoskeletons

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110967
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An updated multi-criteria decision-making method for the sustainable renovation of buildings including environmental, economic and social life-cycle metrics

Martina Caruso, Rui Pinho, Simone Labò, Chiara Passoni et al.
16 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.24
article

An updated multi-criteria decision-making method for the sustainable renovation of buildings including environmental, economic and social life-cycle metrics

Martina Caruso, Rui Pinho, Simone Labò, Chiara Passoni, Alessandra Marini, Margherita Buttazzoni
article en
16 citations

Abstract

The ambitious targets of carbon emission reduction set worldwide for the coming years entail the commitment of structural engineers towards the sustainable renovation of existing buildings. The life cycle thinking (LCT) approach offers a holistic perspective for the design of sustainable retrofitting strategies. It envisages the reduction of the environmental impact at all building life cycle phases, while also addressing economic and social issues. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches support the choice of optimal retrofitting solutions, thus being relevant tools for boosting the actual adoption of LCT in current practices. In this study, a previously proposed MCDM approach is enriched with additional LCT-inspired decision parameters (module D beyond-life impacts, environmental payback period, invasiveness), and is then scrutinised and discussed through its application to a case-study building. Four integrated retrofitting scenarios are investigated using state-of-art seismic loss and energy performance assessment methods, including four different types of exoskeletons, made of timber, steel, and concrete. The end-to-end integrated assessment shows that the inclusion of additional LCT-inspired decision criteria effectively favours LCT-based retrofitting interventions over more traditional ones. • Life Cycle Thinking as a holistic appoach for retrofitting of buildings • Use of a MCDM procedures to identify optimal retrofitting strategies • Consideration of environmental, economic, and social criteria • Application to a case-study building, retrofitted with four types of exoskeletons

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 98
University of Bergamo (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), Global Earthquake Model (IT)
Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.