“Are You Still in Touch With Your Participants?”: The Implications of Asking Questions About Other People’s Research

This article reflects upon the most common question I get asked after presenting my research with youth: Are you still in touch with your participants? On one hand, this question works to counter the long history of researchers leaving participants in the metaphorical dust after fieldwork; it is a history I endeavor to correct with my work, especially as a white male researcher. However, the question also seems to imply that staying in touch with participants is the pinnacle of being a successful ethical researcher. Pulling on critical methodological approaches, this paper thinks through how expecting, hoping, or requiring researchers to stay in touch with youth participants might reflect more about researchers’ (or research’s) desires than about the wants and needs of participants themselves. Moreover, I wonder what this question reveals about common assumptions about what it means to be a participant in a research study (and who it is commonly assumed that participants are), and if there is something to learn about being a “participant” from the study of young people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086241281923
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Are You Still in Touch With Your Participants?”: The Implications of Asking Questions About Other People’s Research

Sam Stiegler
10 citations
Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
11.32
article

“Are You Still in Touch With Your Participants?”: The Implications of Asking Questions About Other People’s Research

Sam Stiegler
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This article reflects upon the most common question I get asked after presenting my research with youth: Are you still in touch with your participants? On one hand, this question works to counter the long history of researchers leaving participants in the metaphorical dust after fieldwork; it is a history I endeavor to correct with my work, especially as a white male researcher. However, the question also seems to imply that staying in touch with participants is the pinnacle of being a successful ethical researcher. Pulling on critical methodological approaches, this paper thinks through how expecting, hoping, or requiring researchers to stay in touch with youth participants might reflect more about researchers’ (or research’s) desires than about the wants and needs of participants themselves. Moreover, I wonder what this question reveals about common assumptions about what it means to be a participant in a research study (and who it is commonly assumed that participants are), and if there is something to learn about being a “participant” from the study of young people.

Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical MethodologiesVol. 25(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Are You Still in Touch With Your Participants?”: The Implications of Asking Questions About Other People’s Research — Sam Stiegler · Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS