Predicting Characteristic Length Scales of Barrier Island Segmentation in Microtidal Environments

Abstract Segmented barrier islands can be found in regions with small tidal ranges. In contrast to tidally dominated barriers, where inlet dynamics are thought to control island length scales, the controls on barrier island length scales in wave‐dominated environments have not been quantified. These microtidal barriers typically have a curved shoreline, suggesting the influence of wave‐driven alongshore sediment transport. Microtidal barriers are also typically hydrodynamically isolated from one another, as weak tidal flows limit interactions between adjoining barriers. To better understand the controls on and scales of barrier segmentation in the relative absence of tides, here we develop a theoretical framework to estimate the alongshore length scales at which a barrier will either breach or heal following a disturbance in the barrier morphology. The non‐dimensional framework compares the timescales of overwash (advective) and alongshore sediment transport (diffusive) processes along barrier island chains. We then apply this framework to modern barrier islands in the microtidal Gulf of Mexico using wave hindcast data and the lengths, widths, heights, and lagoon depths measured from remotely sensed geospatial data and topobathymetric data. We find that most of these barriers are currently longer than their critical length scale, often as a result of coastal restoration efforts. Our critical length scale analysis suggests that most of the Gulf of Mexico barriers are vulnerable to segmentation despite coastal restoration efforts intended to protect fisheries and the mainland coasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jf007437
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Characteristic Length Scales of Barrier Island Segmentation in Microtidal Environments

Heidi Nepf, Travis Swanson, Mary Kule, Rose V. Palermo et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
1.03
article

Predicting Characteristic Length Scales of Barrier Island Segmentation in Microtidal Environments

Heidi Nepf, Travis Swanson, Mary Kule, Rose V. Palermo, Andrew D. Ashton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Segmented barrier islands can be found in regions with small tidal ranges. In contrast to tidally dominated barriers, where inlet dynamics are thought to control island length scales, the controls on barrier island length scales in wave‐dominated environments have not been quantified. These microtidal barriers typically have a curved shoreline, suggesting the influence of wave‐driven alongshore sediment transport. Microtidal barriers are also typically hydrodynamically isolated from one another, as weak tidal flows limit interactions between adjoining barriers. To better understand the controls on and scales of barrier segmentation in the relative absence of tides, here we develop a theoretical framework to estimate the alongshore length scales at which a barrier will either breach or heal following a disturbance in the barrier morphology. The non‐dimensional framework compares the timescales of overwash (advective) and alongshore sediment transport (diffusive) processes along barrier island chains. We then apply this framework to modern barrier islands in the microtidal Gulf of Mexico using wave hindcast data and the lengths, widths, heights, and lagoon depths measured from remotely sensed geospatial data and topobathymetric data. We find that most of these barriers are currently longer than their critical length scale, often as a result of coastal restoration efforts. Our critical length scale analysis suggests that most of the Gulf of Mexico barriers are vulnerable to segmentation despite coastal restoration efforts intended to protect fisheries and the mainland coasts.

Journal of Geophysical Research Earth SurfaceVol. 129(10)
United States Geological Survey (US), College of Charleston (US), Water Institute of the Gulf (US), St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.