The problem of the many: a view from the semantics of numerals and countability

Abstract This paper addresses both semantic issues of countability in linguistics, and philosophical issues arising from the problem of the many. I argue (i) that the problem of the many is orthogonal to vagueness and we should look to the semantics of count nouns and numerals for its solution; (ii) that the problem of the many is a challenge for contemporary mereological analyses of count nouns in semantics; but (iii) that the count criterion in these theories can be weakened to avoid the problem. Specifically, weak quantization is proposed as the criterion: a sum, x , counts as n P s if and only if x has n disjoint parts, each of which is in the extension of P , but where the sum of no two of them is also in the extension of P . I show how importing this idea into the semantics of numerals provides a semantic means of dissolving the paradox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics and Philosophy
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-023-09405-1
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The problem of the many: a view from the semantics of numerals and countability

Peter Roger Sutton
Linguistics and Philosophy
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

The problem of the many: a view from the semantics of numerals and countability

Peter Roger Sutton
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper addresses both semantic issues of countability in linguistics, and philosophical issues arising from the problem of the many. I argue (i) that the problem of the many is orthogonal to vagueness and we should look to the semantics of count nouns and numerals for its solution; (ii) that the problem of the many is a challenge for contemporary mereological analyses of count nouns in semantics; but (iii) that the count criterion in these theories can be weakened to avoid the problem. Specifically, weak quantization is proposed as the criterion: a sum, x , counts as n P s if and only if x has n disjoint parts, each of which is in the extension of P , but where the sum of no two of them is also in the extension of P . I show how importing this idea into the semantics of numerals provides a semantic means of dissolving the paradox.

Linguistics and PhilosophyVol. 47(6)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.