Inhalational exposure to heavy metals: Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment

Occupational exposure to heavy metals (HMs) in various activities might pose a severe risk to human health. A systematic review was undertaken to gather relevant studies on occupational exposure to HMs in various professions without time limitation and included all studies up to February 5, 2023. This study aimed to identify workplaces exposed to HMs, examine HM concentrations in different occupations, and assess the carcinogenic (CR) and non-carcinogenic (HQ) risks of inhalational exposure to these chemicals among employees. A systematic search in the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases using standard keywords yielded 423 studies, 17 of which were included in the analysis. The present review included studies that met the requirements of the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) criteria. The results indicated that the mean concentrations of HM in occupational environments were lower than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) thresholds. In the reviewed studies, the unacceptable CR values were related to work environments such as temples, tobacco cafés, barbeque restaurants, and subways. Cr showed the highest contribution to the CR, followed by Cd > As > Co > Ni > Pb. Also, HQ values in activities related to the subway stations, surgical instrument production industries, and workplaces studied in Alexandropolis were higher than the acceptable level of 1. The most significant HQ values were associated with Ni. Therefore, according to the HQ and CR calculated, which were higher than the permissible values (1 for HQ and 1 × 10 -6 to 1 × 10 -4 for cancer risks) in the investigated jobs, biomonitoring of HMs in the body of employees is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100485
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhalational exposure to heavy metals: Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment

Amir Hossein Khoshakhlagh, Agnieszka Gruszecka‐Kosowska, Safiye Ghobakhloo
22 citations
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Air Quality and Health Impacts
6.92
article

Inhalational exposure to heavy metals: Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment

Amir Hossein Khoshakhlagh, Agnieszka Gruszecka‐Kosowska, Safiye Ghobakhloo
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Occupational exposure to heavy metals (HMs) in various activities might pose a severe risk to human health. A systematic review was undertaken to gather relevant studies on occupational exposure to HMs in various professions without time limitation and included all studies up to February 5, 2023. This study aimed to identify workplaces exposed to HMs, examine HM concentrations in different occupations, and assess the carcinogenic (CR) and non-carcinogenic (HQ) risks of inhalational exposure to these chemicals among employees. A systematic search in the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases using standard keywords yielded 423 studies, 17 of which were included in the analysis. The present review included studies that met the requirements of the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) criteria. The results indicated that the mean concentrations of HM in occupational environments were lower than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) thresholds. In the reviewed studies, the unacceptable CR values were related to work environments such as temples, tobacco cafés, barbeque restaurants, and subways. Cr showed the highest contribution to the CR, followed by Cd > As > Co > Ni > Pb. Also, HQ values in activities related to the subway stations, surgical instrument production industries, and workplaces studied in Alexandropolis were higher than the acceptable level of 1. The most significant HQ values were associated with Ni. Therefore, according to the HQ and CR calculated, which were higher than the permissible values (1 for HQ and 1 × 10 -6 to 1 × 10 -4 for cancer risks) in the investigated jobs, biomonitoring of HMs in the body of employees is recommended.

Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesVol. 16
Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.