Likelihood-ratio test for technological differences in two-stage data envelopment analysis for panel data

This study explores the question of adapting a likelihood-ratio test in the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework, where DEA estimates are regressed against external factors. We focus on the hypotheses of testing the technological difference across time periods (or groups) and propose two bootstrapping procedures. Our Monte Carlo (MC) simulation shows that the proposed test has a substantially better-estimated size for the case of smoothing the ‘spurious ones’, rather than removing them. MC simulation also confirms the curse of dimensionality when the input and output variables increase in the production model. Finally, the proposed test is demonstrated in an empirical illustration. • Bootstrap procedures are proposed for testing technological differences. • Smoothing the observations on frontiers leads to better test size. • Trimming the observations on frontiers leads to the distortion of test size. • Empirical data is used to illustrate the method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.039
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Likelihood-ratio test for technological differences in two-stage data envelopment analysis for panel data

Valentin Zelenyuk, Kai Du
European Journal of Operational Research
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Likelihood-ratio test for technological differences in two-stage data envelopment analysis for panel data

Valentin Zelenyuk, Kai Du
article en

Abstract

This study explores the question of adapting a likelihood-ratio test in the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) framework, where DEA estimates are regressed against external factors. We focus on the hypotheses of testing the technological difference across time periods (or groups) and propose two bootstrapping procedures. Our Monte Carlo (MC) simulation shows that the proposed test has a substantially better-estimated size for the case of smoothing the ‘spurious ones’, rather than removing them. MC simulation also confirms the curse of dimensionality when the input and output variables increase in the production model. Finally, the proposed test is demonstrated in an empirical illustration. • Bootstrap procedures are proposed for testing technological differences. • Smoothing the observations on frontiers leads to better test size. • Trimming the observations on frontiers leads to the distortion of test size. • Empirical data is used to illustrate the method.

European Journal of Operational ResearchVol. 321(2)
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Wollongong (AU)
University of Wollongong, University of Queensland, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.