Experimental variables determine the outcome of RAS-RAS interactions

RAS clustering at the cell membrane is critical to activate signaling in cells, but whether this clustering is mediated exclusively by its c-terminal hypervariable region, receives contributions from the G-domain of RAS, and/or is influenced by secondary effectors has been intensely debated. Reports that G-domain mutations do not modulate RAS-RAS interactions have led some to question the validity of previous experiments that indicate the G-domain plays a role in RAS clustering/interactions. Here we reconcile these findings by clarifying the impact of experimental variables, such as protein expression levels, cellular context, RAS zygosity, and secondary effector interactions on RAS clustering. Lack of control over these variables impacts the results using G-domain mutations across various assay systems and can lead to unsound conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107859
Citations
6
Primary Topic
RNA Research and Splicing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental variables determine the outcome of RAS-RAS interactions

Chiara Ambrogio, Kenneth D. Westover, Christel Poujol, David Santamarı́a et al.
6 citations
Journal of Biological Chemistry
RNA Research and Splicing
1.40
article

Experimental variables determine the outcome of RAS-RAS interactions

Chiara Ambrogio, Kenneth D. Westover, Christel Poujol, David Santamarı́a, Monte M. Winslow, Yibing Shan, Zhiwei Zhou, Ewa Berlinska, Jonas N. Kapp, Sandra Vietti Michelina, Andreas Plückthun, Xing-Xiao Li, Tra Ly Nguyen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

RAS clustering at the cell membrane is critical to activate signaling in cells, but whether this clustering is mediated exclusively by its c-terminal hypervariable region, receives contributions from the G-domain of RAS, and/or is influenced by secondary effectors has been intensely debated. Reports that G-domain mutations do not modulate RAS-RAS interactions have led some to question the validity of previous experiments that indicate the G-domain plays a role in RAS clustering/interactions. Here we reconcile these findings by clarifying the impact of experimental variables, such as protein expression levels, cellular context, RAS zygosity, and secondary effector interactions on RAS clustering. Lack of control over these variables impacts the results using G-domain mutations across various assay systems and can lead to unsound conclusions.

Journal of Biological ChemistryVol. 300(11)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), University of Zurich (CH), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (ES), Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie (FR), Cancer Research Foundation (US), Bordeaux Imaging Center (FR), BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (FR), University of Turin (IT), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Institut National Du Cancer, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
RNA Research and Splicing
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.