Serological prevalence of Brucella spp. at the livestock-human interface in Jordan

Despite its endemic status in the Middle East, key knowledge gaps persist regarding the prevalence, transmission rate, and geographical distribution of both human and livestock brucellosis in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis as well as the incidence of brucellosis in humans in Jordan. A total of 500 human participants (202 exposed and 296 unexposed to livestock) were enrolled in the study. Sampling was conducted at baseline and 1.5 years later. Additionally, a total of 700 livestock were sampled, comprising 20 animals per taxa (camels, cattle, sheep, goats) per site, at both baseline (<i>N</i> = 350) and the 1.5-year follow-up (N = 350). Human participants were longitudinally followed, whereas livestock sampling was conducted opportunistically. Blood samples obtained from both humans and livestock at baseline and follow-up were tested for <i>Brucella</i> spp. serum antibodies using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT). The overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans at baseline was 3.4 % (95 % CI: 2.0-5.4). Positive test results in humans were detected from all five sites with no significant regional variation observed. Seroprevalence was higher in individuals regularly exposed to livestock (6.1 %; 95 % CI: 3.5-9.9) compared to those not regularly exposed (0.80 %; 95 % CI: 0.10-2.9). Incidence of human brucellosis was 924 seropositives per 100,000 person-years, with all incident seropositives occurring in the livestock-exposed cohort. In livestock, the overall seroprevalence of brucellosis was 5.4 % (95 % CI: 3.5-8.3) at baseline compared to 2.6 % (95 % CI: 1.4-4.8) at follow-up. Seropositive livestock were detected at all sites apart from Al-Zarqa, and in all species apart from camels. In conclusion: Brucellosis burden was higher among humans regularly exposed to livestock, re-emphasizing the need for disease control in livestock populations to prevent primary infection in humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
One Health
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100906
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serological prevalence of Brucella spp. at the livestock-human interface in Jordan

Ehab A. Abu‐Basha, Alaa Fahmawi, Zaidoun Hijazeen, Omar Alomarı et al.
2 citations
One Health
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
1.28
article

Serological prevalence of Brucella spp. at the livestock-human interface in Jordan

Ehab A. Abu‐Basha, Alaa Fahmawi, Zaidoun Hijazeen, Omar Alomarı, William B. Karesh, Hani Talafha, Jean DeMarco, Zuhair Bani Ismail, Leen Al-Bayari, Lea Widemann, Yasmin Daradkeh, Mais Lakaideh, Belal Sha’fout, Haia Mellhem, Bilal Al-Omari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite its endemic status in the Middle East, key knowledge gaps persist regarding the prevalence, transmission rate, and geographical distribution of both human and livestock brucellosis in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis as well as the incidence of brucellosis in humans in Jordan. A total of 500 human participants (202 exposed and 296 unexposed to livestock) were enrolled in the study. Sampling was conducted at baseline and 1.5 years later. Additionally, a total of 700 livestock were sampled, comprising 20 animals per taxa (camels, cattle, sheep, goats) per site, at both baseline (<i>N</i> = 350) and the 1.5-year follow-up (N = 350). Human participants were longitudinally followed, whereas livestock sampling was conducted opportunistically. Blood samples obtained from both humans and livestock at baseline and follow-up were tested for <i>Brucella</i> spp. serum antibodies using the Rose Bengal test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT). The overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in humans at baseline was 3.4 % (95 % CI: 2.0-5.4). Positive test results in humans were detected from all five sites with no significant regional variation observed. Seroprevalence was higher in individuals regularly exposed to livestock (6.1 %; 95 % CI: 3.5-9.9) compared to those not regularly exposed (0.80 %; 95 % CI: 0.10-2.9). Incidence of human brucellosis was 924 seropositives per 100,000 person-years, with all incident seropositives occurring in the livestock-exposed cohort. In livestock, the overall seroprevalence of brucellosis was 5.4 % (95 % CI: 3.5-8.3) at baseline compared to 2.6 % (95 % CI: 1.4-4.8) at follow-up. Seropositive livestock were detected at all sites apart from Al-Zarqa, and in all species apart from camels. In conclusion: Brucellosis burden was higher among humans regularly exposed to livestock, re-emphasizing the need for disease control in livestock populations to prevent primary infection in humans.

One HealthVol. 19
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), King Abdullah University Hospital (JO), EcoHealth Alliance (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.