Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices

Dismantling racism in American psychology has recently emerged as a critical goal of the field accompanied by actionable steps being developed in training, research, and practice. To contribute to this significant undertaking, we offer an exploration of the impact of racism on psychological research methods and practices using the ABC model. First, antecedents to the present manifestation of the problem are identified as an advancement of research topics that supported a hereditary hierarchy based on race, the normalization of White participants as standard in comparative studies, and the use of biased measures to investigate various constructs, particularly as it relates to psychological testing. Second, sampling bias is discussed as a systemic behavior that produces racism in psychological research methods; specifically, issues of omission and commission are described along with the use of WEIRD samples and the role of implicit bias in the limited production of knowledge on people of color. Third, the antecedents and behaviors give way to consequences that include threats to cultural validity, unequal treatment and health disparities, and epistemic oppression in the field. We end with recommendations for avoiding a continuation of the field’s racist legacy in present-day psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of General Psychology
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680241289574
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices

Frederick T. L. Leong, Zornitsa Kalibatseva, Nordia A. Scott
2 citations
Review of General Psychology
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
2.26
article

Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices

Frederick T. L. Leong, Zornitsa Kalibatseva, Nordia A. Scott
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dismantling racism in American psychology has recently emerged as a critical goal of the field accompanied by actionable steps being developed in training, research, and practice. To contribute to this significant undertaking, we offer an exploration of the impact of racism on psychological research methods and practices using the ABC model. First, antecedents to the present manifestation of the problem are identified as an advancement of research topics that supported a hereditary hierarchy based on race, the normalization of White participants as standard in comparative studies, and the use of biased measures to investigate various constructs, particularly as it relates to psychological testing. Second, sampling bias is discussed as a systemic behavior that produces racism in psychological research methods; specifically, issues of omission and commission are described along with the use of WEIRD samples and the role of implicit bias in the limited production of knowledge on people of color. Third, the antecedents and behaviors give way to consequences that include threats to cultural validity, unequal treatment and health disparities, and epistemic oppression in the field. We end with recommendations for avoiding a continuation of the field’s racist legacy in present-day psychology.

Review of General PsychologyVol. 28(4)
Stockton University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices — Frederick T. L. Leong, Zornitsa Kalibatseva, et al. · Review of General Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS