A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing

The data on the number of animals used for experimental purposes, with a particular focus on regulatory toxicity studies, in Turkey and EU member states plus Norway (EU+), were compared for the period 2015 to 2020 (UK data after Brexit for 2020 were included too). The total number of listed vertebrates used for regulatory toxicity testing in the full 6-year reporting period in Turkey was 3.6% of that reported for the EU+. However, these numbers showed an increasing trend over the reporting period in Turkey, while the trend decreased in the EU+. In the top three most-used species for regulatory toxicology purposes in Turkey, 41% were fish (68,758 animals), followed by rats (29%; 49,975 animals), and then mice (20%; 33,292 animals). Turkey used low numbers of cats and dogs, while the corresponding number for the EU+ was more than 70-fold higher. Non-human primates were not used at all in Turkey, whereas about 34,000 were used in EU+ laboratories. The majority of toxicity tests (57%) performed in Turkey were categorised as 'Other' toxicity tests, and 27% were acute and sub-acute toxicity tests. Successful replacement alternatives (e.g. <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> approaches) are already used in a wide range of research areas. However, although this new research and testing paradigm is underpinned by scientific evidence, the legislation and pace of acceptance of these new techniques in Turkey is considerably lagging behind other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929241286885
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing

Aşkın Yaşar, R. van den Hoven, Çağrı Çağlar Sinmez
1 citations
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Animal testing and alternatives
0.64
article

A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing

Aşkın Yaşar, R. van den Hoven, Çağrı Çağlar Sinmez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The data on the number of animals used for experimental purposes, with a particular focus on regulatory toxicity studies, in Turkey and EU member states plus Norway (EU+), were compared for the period 2015 to 2020 (UK data after Brexit for 2020 were included too). The total number of listed vertebrates used for regulatory toxicity testing in the full 6-year reporting period in Turkey was 3.6% of that reported for the EU+. However, these numbers showed an increasing trend over the reporting period in Turkey, while the trend decreased in the EU+. In the top three most-used species for regulatory toxicology purposes in Turkey, 41% were fish (68,758 animals), followed by rats (29%; 49,975 animals), and then mice (20%; 33,292 animals). Turkey used low numbers of cats and dogs, while the corresponding number for the EU+ was more than 70-fold higher. Non-human primates were not used at all in Turkey, whereas about 34,000 were used in EU+ laboratories. The majority of toxicity tests (57%) performed in Turkey were categorised as 'Other' toxicity tests, and 27% were acute and sub-acute toxicity tests. Successful replacement alternatives (e.g. <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> approaches) are already used in a wide range of research areas. However, although this new research and testing paradigm is underpinned by scientific evidence, the legislation and pace of acceptance of these new techniques in Turkey is considerably lagging behind other countries.

Alternatives to Laboratory AnimalsVol. 52(6)
University of Vienna (AT), Selçuk University (TR), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Erciyes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Animal testing and alternatives
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of European Union and Turkish Reports on the Statistics of Experimental Animal Use in Toxicity Testing — Aşkın Yaşar, R. van den Hoven, et al. · Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS