Rethinking multi‐site studies in social and personality psychology: Can the cross‐indigenous approach remedy common cross‐cultural vulnerabilities?

Abstract The cross‐indigenous approach is introduced as a framework for conducting multi‐site studies. The cross‐indigenous approach is a simultaneous multi‐emic approach to studying psychological and social phenomena across cultures which intends to mitigate vulnerabilities commonly found in typical cross‐cultural studies done in social and personality psychology including methodological artifacts introduced when instruments, protocols, or research design do not work as expected across target cultures, and the unrealistic expectation of construct equivalence across sites. The article discusses ways to carry out a cross‐indigenous project which aims to be a principled way of making comparisons across cultures, aiming to stake out what are unique, what are shared and what are universals across populations, to explain psychological and social processes through culture‐sensitive and naturalistic methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70007
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking multi‐site studies in social and personality psychology: Can the cross‐indigenous approach remedy common cross‐cultural vulnerabilities?

Miguel Alejandro A. Silan
5 citations
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Cultural Differences and Values
3.22
article

Rethinking multi‐site studies in social and personality psychology: Can the cross‐indigenous approach remedy common cross‐cultural vulnerabilities?

Miguel Alejandro A. Silan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The cross‐indigenous approach is introduced as a framework for conducting multi‐site studies. The cross‐indigenous approach is a simultaneous multi‐emic approach to studying psychological and social phenomena across cultures which intends to mitigate vulnerabilities commonly found in typical cross‐cultural studies done in social and personality psychology including methodological artifacts introduced when instruments, protocols, or research design do not work as expected across target cultures, and the unrealistic expectation of construct equivalence across sites. The article discusses ways to carry out a cross‐indigenous project which aims to be a principled way of making comparisons across cultures, aiming to stake out what are unique, what are shared and what are universals across populations, to explain psychological and social processes through culture‐sensitive and naturalistic methods.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 18(10)
Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cultural Differences and Values
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.