7437 Harnessing Diabetes Technology for Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Diabetes

Abstract Disclosure: A. Knape: None. A. Kotwal: None. D. Rohlfsen: None. A. Patel: None. W. Goldner: None. Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key treatment modality for many cancers. One percent of patients who receive ICIs can develop insulin deficient ICI associated diabetes (ICI-DM). These patients often have complex oncologic therapy plans making treatment of newly diagnosed insulin deficient diabetes challenging which often results in additional healthcare-related burden for the patient. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of five adults who developed ICI-DM after receiving either PD-1, CTLA-4 or PDL-1 inhibitors or a combination. Data on demographics, medical history and labs were collected in addition to mode of glucose monitoring and treatment after diagnosis of ICI-DM. Results: Patients were age 44-72 at diagnosis of ICI-DM, three were female. Two were admitted to the hospital in DKA, one was diagnosed in the ER with severe hyperglycemia without DKA, two had outpatient hyperglycemia without DKA. Glucose at diagnosis ranged from 215-510 mg/dL. C-peptide was low for all patients. Fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) monitoring and basal/bolus insulin was immediately initiated for all patients. All were transitioned from FSBS to continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and 2/5 ultimately transitioned to sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy (AID). Time in range on CGM improved in four patients with percent time in range improving between 10-48%. In two patients, hypoglycemia frequency declined by 6% and 3%. Hyperglycemia frequency declined by 13% and 48% in patients on AID therapy and by 14% and 25% in two of those on basal/bolus insulin therapy. All patients preferred CGM over FSBS and remained on CGM therapy. Those who chose AID preferred it over basal/bolus insulin therapy stating it was less complicated than basal/bolus insulin with CGM. Conclusions: We report successful treatment of five cases of ICI-DM with CGM + basal/bolus insulin or AID. 80% demonstrated improved time in range and decreased overall frequency of hyperglycemia. 40% had decreased frequency of hypoglycemia. CGM allows for dynamic adjustment of insulin therapy in a population with complex medical regimens resulting in fluctuating glucose levels. The integrated pump and sensor technology in AID was less burdensome than basal/bolus in those who chose it. Managing ICI-DM is complicated. The burden of this entity can be lessened by harnessing the power of diabetes technology. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae163.794
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

7437 Harnessing Diabetes Technology for Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Diabetes

Whitney Goldner, Anery Patel, Anupam Kotwal, Anne Knape et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

7437 Harnessing Diabetes Technology for Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Diabetes

Whitney Goldner, Anery Patel, Anupam Kotwal, Anne Knape, Dorotha Rohlfsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: A. Knape: None. A. Kotwal: None. D. Rohlfsen: None. A. Patel: None. W. Goldner: None. Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key treatment modality for many cancers. One percent of patients who receive ICIs can develop insulin deficient ICI associated diabetes (ICI-DM). These patients often have complex oncologic therapy plans making treatment of newly diagnosed insulin deficient diabetes challenging which often results in additional healthcare-related burden for the patient. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of five adults who developed ICI-DM after receiving either PD-1, CTLA-4 or PDL-1 inhibitors or a combination. Data on demographics, medical history and labs were collected in addition to mode of glucose monitoring and treatment after diagnosis of ICI-DM. Results: Patients were age 44-72 at diagnosis of ICI-DM, three were female. Two were admitted to the hospital in DKA, one was diagnosed in the ER with severe hyperglycemia without DKA, two had outpatient hyperglycemia without DKA. Glucose at diagnosis ranged from 215-510 mg/dL. C-peptide was low for all patients. Fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) monitoring and basal/bolus insulin was immediately initiated for all patients. All were transitioned from FSBS to continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and 2/5 ultimately transitioned to sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy (AID). Time in range on CGM improved in four patients with percent time in range improving between 10-48%. In two patients, hypoglycemia frequency declined by 6% and 3%. Hyperglycemia frequency declined by 13% and 48% in patients on AID therapy and by 14% and 25% in two of those on basal/bolus insulin therapy. All patients preferred CGM over FSBS and remained on CGM therapy. Those who chose AID preferred it over basal/bolus insulin therapy stating it was less complicated than basal/bolus insulin with CGM. Conclusions: We report successful treatment of five cases of ICI-DM with CGM + basal/bolus insulin or AID. 80% demonstrated improved time in range and decreased overall frequency of hyperglycemia. 40% had decreased frequency of hypoglycemia. CGM allows for dynamic adjustment of insulin therapy in a population with complex medical regimens resulting in fluctuating glucose levels. The integrated pump and sensor technology in AID was less burdensome than basal/bolus in those who chose it. Managing ICI-DM is complicated. The burden of this entity can be lessened by harnessing the power of diabetes technology. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.