ZNO-Eval: Benchmarking reasoning capabilities of large language models in Ukrainian

As the usage of large language models for problems outside of simple text understanding or generation increases, assessing their abilities and limitations becomes crucial. While significant progress has been made in this area over the last few years, most research has focused on benchmarking English, leaving other languages underexplored. This makes evaluating the reasoning and robustness level of language models in Ukrainian particularly challenging. The purpose of this work is to establish a comprehensive benchmark for the reasoning capabilities evaluation of large language models in the Ukrainian language. This paper presents the ZNO-Eval benchmark based on real exam tasks from Ukraine's standardized educational testing system: the External Independent Evaluation and the National Multi-subject Test. With single- answer options, multiple-choice, matching, and open-ended questions from diverse subjects, including Ukrainian language, mathematics, history, and geography, this dataset paves the way toward a thorough analysis of reasoning capabilities across different domains and complexities. Evaluation of several well-known language models, such as GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4-Turbo, Mistral Large, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini-1.5 Pro on this benchmark demonstrated the superiority of GPT-4o in both common knowledge reasoning and intricate language tasks. At the same time, Gemini Pro and GPT-4 Turbo excelled in the arithmetic domain, leading in single-answer and open-ended math problems. While all models were close to max performance in text-only common knowledge tasks like history and geography, there still is a gap for Ukrainian language and math, thus highlighting the importance of developing specialized language benchmarks for more accurate assessments of model capabilities and limitations across different languages and contexts. This research introduced ZNO-Eval, an effective benchmark for evaluating reasoning capabilities, and thoroughly explored the abilities and limitations of modern solutions in the Ukrainian language. Future research should aim to expand the scope of ZNO-Eval to other modalities like images commonly used for exam problem description.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ìnformatika, kulʹtura, tehnìka.
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15276/ict.01.2024.27
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ZNO-Eval: Benchmarking reasoning capabilities of large language models in Ukrainian

Victoria M. Ruvinskaya, Anastasiya S. Troynina, Mykyta V. Syromiatnikov
2 citations
Ìnformatika, kulʹtura, tehnìka.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.69
article

ZNO-Eval: Benchmarking reasoning capabilities of large language models in Ukrainian

Victoria M. Ruvinskaya, Anastasiya S. Troynina, Mykyta V. Syromiatnikov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As the usage of large language models for problems outside of simple text understanding or generation increases, assessing their abilities and limitations becomes crucial. While significant progress has been made in this area over the last few years, most research has focused on benchmarking English, leaving other languages underexplored. This makes evaluating the reasoning and robustness level of language models in Ukrainian particularly challenging. The purpose of this work is to establish a comprehensive benchmark for the reasoning capabilities evaluation of large language models in the Ukrainian language. This paper presents the ZNO-Eval benchmark based on real exam tasks from Ukraine's standardized educational testing system: the External Independent Evaluation and the National Multi-subject Test. With single- answer options, multiple-choice, matching, and open-ended questions from diverse subjects, including Ukrainian language, mathematics, history, and geography, this dataset paves the way toward a thorough analysis of reasoning capabilities across different domains and complexities. Evaluation of several well-known language models, such as GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4-Turbo, Mistral Large, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini-1.5 Pro on this benchmark demonstrated the superiority of GPT-4o in both common knowledge reasoning and intricate language tasks. At the same time, Gemini Pro and GPT-4 Turbo excelled in the arithmetic domain, leading in single-answer and open-ended math problems. While all models were close to max performance in text-only common knowledge tasks like history and geography, there still is a gap for Ukrainian language and math, thus highlighting the importance of developing specialized language benchmarks for more accurate assessments of model capabilities and limitations across different languages and contexts. This research introduced ZNO-Eval, an effective benchmark for evaluating reasoning capabilities, and thoroughly explored the abilities and limitations of modern solutions in the Ukrainian language. Future research should aim to expand the scope of ZNO-Eval to other modalities like images commonly used for exam problem description.

Ìnformatika, kulʹtura, tehnìka.Vol. 1(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ZNO-Eval: Benchmarking reasoning capabilities of large language models in Ukrainian — Victoria M. Ruvinskaya, Anastasiya S. Troynina, et al. · Ìnformatika, kulʹtura, tehnìka. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS