7303 Fasting and Post-load Glucose in Exclusively Breastfeeding Women With Diabetes Risk Factors

Abstract Disclosure: N. Neamonitaki: None. T. Thaweethai: None. D. Pant: None. K. James: None. M.D. Soffer: None. E.A. Rosenberg: None. C.E. Powe: Consulting Fee; Self; Mediflix, Inc. Other; Self; Wolters Kluwer, Up to Date Author. Background: Epidemiologic studies show a reduction in type 2 diabetes incidence with increased lactation duration and intensity, but physiologic mechanisms underlying this association are incompletely characterized. We examined associations between lactation and glycemic physiology in postpartum women. ​ Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of postpartum participants in a prospective longitudinal cohort study that examined glucose and insulin physiology via serial 2-hr 75-gram oral glucose tolerance tests during pregnancy and postpartum in women with diabetes risk factors. We used linear regression to examine associations between exclusive breastfeeding and fasting glucose, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, and number of weeks postpartum. Secondary analyses examined associations with post-load glucose and insulin physiology. Additional analyses considered exclusive breastfeeding compared to exclusive formula feeding and a combination of formula and breastfeeding separately using a categorical exposure variable. Results: Of N=108 women at a mean (SD) of 11 (5.0) weeks postpartum, 56 reported exclusively breastfeeding and 52 reported not exclusively breastfeeding (15 were exclusively formula feeding and 37 were both breast- and formula feeding). Mean (SD) fasting glucose was 83 (7.0) mg/dl in those exclusively breastfeeding and 85 (8.9) mg/dl in those who were not. Fasting glucose was not significantly different in those who were exclusively breastfeeding compared to those who were not after confounder adjustment (β [95% CI] =-1.3 [-4.6, 2.0] mg/dl, P=0.45). The 60- minute post-load glucose was nominally higher in those exclusively breastfeeding, with a mean (SD) of 132 (37.5) mg/dl versus 118 (31.6) mg/dl in those who were not; this difference did not reach statistical significance in the adjusted model (β [95% CI] =12.6 [-2.1, 27] mg/dl, P=0.09). In additional analyses, fasting glucose was not significantly different between women exclusively breastfeeding, exclusively formula feeding, or both breast- and formula feeding; however, post-load glucose at 30 and 60 minutes was higher in the exclusively breastfeeding group compared to the exclusively formula feeding group (30-minute: β [95% CI]= 16 [0.36,32] mg/dl, P=0.045); 60-minute: 26 [4.0,47] mg/dl, P=0.02) in adjusted models. We did not find significant associations with insulin physiology measures. Conclusion: We did not observe lower fasting glucose with exclusive breastfeeding. Instead, glucose levels at 30 and 60 minutes after an oral glucose load were higher in exclusively breastfeeding participants compared to exclusively formula feeding participants. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae163.774
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

7303 Fasting and Post-load Glucose in Exclusively Breastfeeding Women With Diabetes Risk Factors

Tanayott Thaweethai, Kaitlyn E. James, Deepti Pant, Emily A. Rosenberg et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

7303 Fasting and Post-load Glucose in Exclusively Breastfeeding Women With Diabetes Risk Factors

Tanayott Thaweethai, Kaitlyn E. James, Deepti Pant, Emily A. Rosenberg, Marti D. Soffer, Camille Elise Powe, Nefeli Neamonitaki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: N. Neamonitaki: None. T. Thaweethai: None. D. Pant: None. K. James: None. M.D. Soffer: None. E.A. Rosenberg: None. C.E. Powe: Consulting Fee; Self; Mediflix, Inc. Other; Self; Wolters Kluwer, Up to Date Author. Background: Epidemiologic studies show a reduction in type 2 diabetes incidence with increased lactation duration and intensity, but physiologic mechanisms underlying this association are incompletely characterized. We examined associations between lactation and glycemic physiology in postpartum women. ​ Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of postpartum participants in a prospective longitudinal cohort study that examined glucose and insulin physiology via serial 2-hr 75-gram oral glucose tolerance tests during pregnancy and postpartum in women with diabetes risk factors. We used linear regression to examine associations between exclusive breastfeeding and fasting glucose, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, and number of weeks postpartum. Secondary analyses examined associations with post-load glucose and insulin physiology. Additional analyses considered exclusive breastfeeding compared to exclusive formula feeding and a combination of formula and breastfeeding separately using a categorical exposure variable. Results: Of N=108 women at a mean (SD) of 11 (5.0) weeks postpartum, 56 reported exclusively breastfeeding and 52 reported not exclusively breastfeeding (15 were exclusively formula feeding and 37 were both breast- and formula feeding). Mean (SD) fasting glucose was 83 (7.0) mg/dl in those exclusively breastfeeding and 85 (8.9) mg/dl in those who were not. Fasting glucose was not significantly different in those who were exclusively breastfeeding compared to those who were not after confounder adjustment (β [95% CI] =-1.3 [-4.6, 2.0] mg/dl, P=0.45). The 60- minute post-load glucose was nominally higher in those exclusively breastfeeding, with a mean (SD) of 132 (37.5) mg/dl versus 118 (31.6) mg/dl in those who were not; this difference did not reach statistical significance in the adjusted model (β [95% CI] =12.6 [-2.1, 27] mg/dl, P=0.09). In additional analyses, fasting glucose was not significantly different between women exclusively breastfeeding, exclusively formula feeding, or both breast- and formula feeding; however, post-load glucose at 30 and 60 minutes was higher in the exclusively breastfeeding group compared to the exclusively formula feeding group (30-minute: β [95% CI]= 16 [0.36,32] mg/dl, P=0.045); 60-minute: 26 [4.0,47] mg/dl, P=0.02) in adjusted models. We did not find significant associations with insulin physiology measures. Conclusion: We did not observe lower fasting glucose with exclusive breastfeeding. Instead, glucose levels at 30 and 60 minutes after an oral glucose load were higher in exclusively breastfeeding participants compared to exclusively formula feeding participants. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.