Benchmarking data handling strategies for landslide susceptibility modeling using random forest workflows

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are frequently used in landslide susceptibility modeling. Different data handling strategies may generate variations in landslide susceptibility modeling, even when using the same ML algorithm. This research aims to compare the combinations of inventory data handling, cross validation (CV), and hyperparameter tuning strategies to generate landslide susceptibility maps. The results are expected to provide a general strategy for landslide susceptibility modeling using ML techniques. The authors employed eight landslide inventory data handling scenarios to convert a landslide polygon into a landslide point, i.e., the landslide point is located on the toe (minimum height), on the scarp (maximum height), at the center of the landslide, randomly inside the polygon (1 point), randomly inside the polygon (3 points), randomly inside the polygon (5 points), randomly inside the polygon (10 points), and 15 m grid sampling. Random forest models using CV–nonspatial hyperparameter tuning, spatial CV–spatial hyperparameter tuning, and spatial CV–forward feature selection–no hyperparameter tuning were applied for each data handling strategy. The combination generated 24 random forest ML workflows, which are applied using a complete inventory of 743 landslides triggered by Tropical Cyclone Cempaka 2017 in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia, and 11 landslide controlling factors. The results show that grid sampling with spatial CV and spatial hyperparameter tuning is favorable because the strategy can minimize overfitting, generate a relatively high-performance predictive model, and reduce the appearance of susceptibility artifacts in the landslide area. Careful data inventory handling, CV, and hyperparameter tuning strategies should be considered in landslide susceptibility modeling to increase the applicability of landslide susceptibility maps in practical application. • Spatial cross validation (CV)–spatial hyperparameter tuning can minimize overfitting in machine learning algorithm for landslide susceptibility modeling • Grid sampling with spatial CV and spatial hyperparameter tuning strategy is favorable in landslide susceptibility modeling • Careful data inventory handling, CV, and hyperparameter tuning strategies should be considered in landslide susceptibility modeling • Data handling strategy is able to minimize overfitting, generate high-performance predictive model, and reduce the appearance of susceptibility artifacts

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100093
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking data handling strategies for landslide susceptibility modeling using random forest workflows

Ngadisih, Guruh Samodra, Ferman Setia Nugroho
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences
Landslides and related hazards
1.42
article

Benchmarking data handling strategies for landslide susceptibility modeling using random forest workflows

Ngadisih, Guruh Samodra, Ferman Setia Nugroho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are frequently used in landslide susceptibility modeling. Different data handling strategies may generate variations in landslide susceptibility modeling, even when using the same ML algorithm. This research aims to compare the combinations of inventory data handling, cross validation (CV), and hyperparameter tuning strategies to generate landslide susceptibility maps. The results are expected to provide a general strategy for landslide susceptibility modeling using ML techniques. The authors employed eight landslide inventory data handling scenarios to convert a landslide polygon into a landslide point, i.e., the landslide point is located on the toe (minimum height), on the scarp (maximum height), at the center of the landslide, randomly inside the polygon (1 point), randomly inside the polygon (3 points), randomly inside the polygon (5 points), randomly inside the polygon (10 points), and 15 m grid sampling. Random forest models using CV–nonspatial hyperparameter tuning, spatial CV–spatial hyperparameter tuning, and spatial CV–forward feature selection–no hyperparameter tuning were applied for each data handling strategy. The combination generated 24 random forest ML workflows, which are applied using a complete inventory of 743 landslides triggered by Tropical Cyclone Cempaka 2017 in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia, and 11 landslide controlling factors. The results show that grid sampling with spatial CV and spatial hyperparameter tuning is favorable because the strategy can minimize overfitting, generate a relatively high-performance predictive model, and reduce the appearance of susceptibility artifacts in the landslide area. Careful data inventory handling, CV, and hyperparameter tuning strategies should be considered in landslide susceptibility modeling to increase the applicability of landslide susceptibility maps in practical application. • Spatial cross validation (CV)–spatial hyperparameter tuning can minimize overfitting in machine learning algorithm for landslide susceptibility modeling • Grid sampling with spatial CV and spatial hyperparameter tuning strategy is favorable in landslide susceptibility modeling • Careful data inventory handling, CV, and hyperparameter tuning strategies should be considered in landslide susceptibility modeling • Data handling strategy is able to minimize overfitting, generate high-performance predictive model, and reduce the appearance of susceptibility artifacts

Artificial Intelligence in GeosciencesVol. 5
Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Landslides and related hazards
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.