7393 Measuring Diabetes Outcomes of Telemedicine Versus In-Office Visits at an Endocrinology Practice in Rural West Virginia

Abstract Disclosure: C. Muojieje: None. H.K. Driscoll: None. Background: West Virginia has limited specialty access despite high diabetes rates. Telemedicine expanded during COVID-19 as an alternative for care delivery while encouraging social distancing. Objective: Compare diabetes outcomes between telemedicine and in-office visits at the Marshall Health Endocrinology practice in Huntington, West Virginia Methods: Retrospective cohort study using records from Marshall Health Endocrinology from March 2019-March 2023. Adults aged 18-65 with type 1/type 2 diabetes with baseline HbA1c >7% on medications were included with clinic follow-up every 6 months. Primary outcome was HbA1c change. Secondary outcomes were changes in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, microalbumin/creatinine ratio and diabetes hospitalizations. Change scores were calculated by subtracting values from the visit from values at 3-6 month follow up. Wilcoxon Signed Rank test compared outcomes within each patient. The study was approved by the Marshall IRB. Results: Of 72 patients, 8 had complete data allowing comparison between visit types for HbA1c. HbA1c increased after telemedicine (mean=-1.2; SD=2.08) but stayed the same after in-office (mean=0.03; SD= 0.19; p=0.039). Insufficient data precluded analysis of secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Results suggest potentially worse glycemic control with telemedicine versus in-office visits, unlike prior studies finding equivalence between telemedicine and in-office care for diabetes outcomes. This study’s findings were similar to previous study that have found telemedicine had slightly worse outcomes. This contrasts with other previous studies that generally found telemedicine to be equally efficacious for diabetes management. The small sample size precludes definitively establishing worse outcomes for telemedicine. Larger randomized studies are needed to definitively compare outcomes between visit types for rural diabetes populations and determine if telemedicine truly delivers subpar diabetes outcomes compared to in-office care. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae163.842
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

7393 Measuring Diabetes Outcomes of Telemedicine Versus In-Office Visits at an Endocrinology Practice in Rural West Virginia

Ghadah Thiab, Henry K. Driscoll, Heba Boustany, Chukwudi Muojieje et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

7393 Measuring Diabetes Outcomes of Telemedicine Versus In-Office Visits at an Endocrinology Practice in Rural West Virginia

Ghadah Thiab, Henry K. Driscoll, Heba Boustany, Chukwudi Muojieje, Emily G. Saurborn, Derian Nayiri, S. E. Crow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: C. Muojieje: None. H.K. Driscoll: None. Background: West Virginia has limited specialty access despite high diabetes rates. Telemedicine expanded during COVID-19 as an alternative for care delivery while encouraging social distancing. Objective: Compare diabetes outcomes between telemedicine and in-office visits at the Marshall Health Endocrinology practice in Huntington, West Virginia Methods: Retrospective cohort study using records from Marshall Health Endocrinology from March 2019-March 2023. Adults aged 18-65 with type 1/type 2 diabetes with baseline HbA1c >7% on medications were included with clinic follow-up every 6 months. Primary outcome was HbA1c change. Secondary outcomes were changes in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, microalbumin/creatinine ratio and diabetes hospitalizations. Change scores were calculated by subtracting values from the visit from values at 3-6 month follow up. Wilcoxon Signed Rank test compared outcomes within each patient. The study was approved by the Marshall IRB. Results: Of 72 patients, 8 had complete data allowing comparison between visit types for HbA1c. HbA1c increased after telemedicine (mean=-1.2; SD=2.08) but stayed the same after in-office (mean=0.03; SD= 0.19; p=0.039). Insufficient data precluded analysis of secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Results suggest potentially worse glycemic control with telemedicine versus in-office visits, unlike prior studies finding equivalence between telemedicine and in-office care for diabetes outcomes. This study’s findings were similar to previous study that have found telemedicine had slightly worse outcomes. This contrasts with other previous studies that generally found telemedicine to be equally efficacious for diabetes management. The small sample size precludes definitively establishing worse outcomes for telemedicine. Larger randomized studies are needed to definitively compare outcomes between visit types for rural diabetes populations and determine if telemedicine truly delivers subpar diabetes outcomes compared to in-office care. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 8(Supplement_1)
Marshall University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.