Restorative and regenerative green spaces for vulnerable communities in social housing: The impact of a community greening program

Vulnerable communities represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic and social wellbeing outcomes. Community gardening has emerged globally as a community-based remedy to reduce these inequities and enhance wellbeing. This paper examines the psychological, socio-cultural and health impact of social housing design that includes access to, and engagement with green spaces. The project was multi-disciplinary and used mixed-method research to examine the impact of community gardening for people in social housing. Two interrelated studies were conducted; study 1 involved 33 social housing gardeners in a pre-post program survey. Statistically significant improvements were found in participants' satisfaction with personal wellbeing, health, and community connectedness; as well as increased gardening skills, positive social experiences, and time spent in nature. Study 2 involved 34 semi-structured interviews conducted with program facilitators and partner organisation staff. Results uncovered that participant's engagement with gardening was restorative and regenerative. Four salient themes emerged from our mixed methods study: 1) connection to self; 2) connection to others, 3) connection to place; and 4) connection to purpose. The findings showcase some of the key principles of a successful social and nature prescription intervention for vulnerable people. Community gardening was shown to amplify civic pride and bolster community resilience. Our research suggests the broad impact of community gardening on participant outcomes for vulnerable populations and enhances the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for sustainable, restorative residential communities. • Community gardening is a successful social and nature prescription intervention. • Community gardening improves health, wellbeing and community connectedness. • Community gardening reduces vulnerability by increasing social cohesion and safety. • Social housing design needs to include restorative and regenerative green spaces. • Policies for social housing should include community gardening projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102448
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restorative and regenerative green spaces for vulnerable communities in social housing: The impact of a community greening program

Tonia Gray, Danielle Tracey, Fiona Pigott
3 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
1.80
article

Restorative and regenerative green spaces for vulnerable communities in social housing: The impact of a community greening program

Tonia Gray, Danielle Tracey, Fiona Pigott
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Vulnerable communities represent the most at-risk populations facing inequities and negative health, economic and social wellbeing outcomes. Community gardening has emerged globally as a community-based remedy to reduce these inequities and enhance wellbeing. This paper examines the psychological, socio-cultural and health impact of social housing design that includes access to, and engagement with green spaces. The project was multi-disciplinary and used mixed-method research to examine the impact of community gardening for people in social housing. Two interrelated studies were conducted; study 1 involved 33 social housing gardeners in a pre-post program survey. Statistically significant improvements were found in participants' satisfaction with personal wellbeing, health, and community connectedness; as well as increased gardening skills, positive social experiences, and time spent in nature. Study 2 involved 34 semi-structured interviews conducted with program facilitators and partner organisation staff. Results uncovered that participant's engagement with gardening was restorative and regenerative. Four salient themes emerged from our mixed methods study: 1) connection to self; 2) connection to others, 3) connection to place; and 4) connection to purpose. The findings showcase some of the key principles of a successful social and nature prescription intervention for vulnerable people. Community gardening was shown to amplify civic pride and bolster community resilience. Our research suggests the broad impact of community gardening on participant outcomes for vulnerable populations and enhances the capacity of practitioners to translate research into policy and practice for sustainable, restorative residential communities. • Community gardening is a successful social and nature prescription intervention. • Community gardening improves health, wellbeing and community connectedness. • Community gardening reduces vulnerability by increasing social cohesion and safety. • Social housing design needs to include restorative and regenerative green spaces. • Policies for social housing should include community gardening projects.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 99
Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
1.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.