8418 Association of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Serious Liver Events among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and MASLD

Abstract Disclosure: A. Kutz: None. D.J. Wexler: None. J. Liu: None. J.M. Paik: None. E. Patorno: None. Introduction and study question Little is known about the cardiovascular (CV) and hepatic effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and known metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in clinical practice. We assessed the comparative CV and hepatic effectiveness and the safety of GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i in people with T2D and prevalent MASLD. Methodology Using pooled data from Medicare fee-for-service (2013–2020) and a large U.S. health insurance database (2013-June 2022), we conducted two propensity-score fine stratification weighted cohort studies including adults with T2D and a diagnosis of MASLD who initiated GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i, reference). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed the primary CV effectiveness composite outcome of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or all-cause mortality. The primary hepatic effectiveness outcome was a composite of serious liver events (hospitalization for ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, or liver transplantation). The safety outcome was a composite of severe adverse events (lower limb amputation, non-vertebral fracture, emergency admission for hypoglycemia, or hospitalization for acute kidney injury, diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA], severe genital or urinary tract infection, acute pancreatitis, or biliary event). Major results Compared with DPP-4i (n=17,084 initiators), the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary CV outcome associated with GLP-1 RA (n=13,666 initiators) was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81), corresponding to an incidence rate difference (IRD) per 1,000 person-years of -21.6 (95% CI, -26.7 to -16.6). The HR for the primary hepatic outcome was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.90), the IRD -2.1 (95% CI -3.4 to -0.9). Similar CV benefits were observed for SGLT-2i (n=11,108) vs DPP-4i (n=16,979), with a HR for the primary CV outcome of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70–0.96) and an IRD of -11.0 (95% CI -16.2 to -5.8). For the primary hepatic outcome, the HR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.44) and the IRD -1.1 (95% CI -2.4 to 0.3). Severe adverse events were not more frequent with GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i compared with DPP-4i. Interpretation and conclusion Among people with T2D and MASLD, the use of GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i was associated with fewer CV events, vs DPP-4i, while GLP-1 RA also reduced serious liver events. Compared with DPP-4i, GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i were not associated with higher safety adverse event rates. Presentation: 6/2/2024