Creating a comprehensive framework for design, construction and management of healthy buildings

• Holistic and comprehensive Healthy Buildings framework. • Five healthy buildings dimensions that are interrelated. • 12 case studies tested on the dimensions and associated indicators of the framework. • National and EU-wide data tracking on indicators. • Future research should explore framework application in various building types. While healthy buildings are investigated in academic research, practice, and policy, they often fail to address the needs and gaps due to insufficient knowledge transfer between them. Moreover, there is no general definition of healthy buildings that could act as a reference for different stakeholders of the building sector. Therefore, this paper presents a novel framework for healthy buildings and a definition for compiling existing knowledge and addressing the needs and gaps. The holistic approach of the framework was developed through an extensive literature review and tested with 12 building case studies in the major European climate zones. The framework outlines five different dimensions (improving mental and physical health, designed for human needs, sustainably built and managed, resilient and adaptive, empowering people), including 24 indicators and sub-indicators. The validation of the framework revealed that it is possible to assess different building projects against different indicators under each dimension. However, challenges remain due to issues such as lack of time, cost of data collection, or lack of documentation. The developed framework provides a balanced approach that promotes both individual well-being and broader sustainability goals. It provides necessary guidance to inform practitioners and policy makers as well as other building sector stakeholders to integrate healthy buildings thinking into their project development, assessment, and decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114883
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating a comprehensive framework for design, construction and management of healthy buildings

Jens Christoffersen, Corinne Mandin, Caroline Düvier, Pawel Wargocki et al.
12 citations
Energy and Buildings
Urban Green Space and Health
3.78
article

Creating a comprehensive framework for design, construction and management of healthy buildings

Jens Christoffersen, Corinne Mandin, Caroline Düvier, Pawel Wargocki, Marcel Schweiker, Essam Elnagar, Sheikh Zuhaib
article en
12 citations

Abstract

• Holistic and comprehensive Healthy Buildings framework. • Five healthy buildings dimensions that are interrelated. • 12 case studies tested on the dimensions and associated indicators of the framework. • National and EU-wide data tracking on indicators. • Future research should explore framework application in various building types. While healthy buildings are investigated in academic research, practice, and policy, they often fail to address the needs and gaps due to insufficient knowledge transfer between them. Moreover, there is no general definition of healthy buildings that could act as a reference for different stakeholders of the building sector. Therefore, this paper presents a novel framework for healthy buildings and a definition for compiling existing knowledge and addressing the needs and gaps. The holistic approach of the framework was developed through an extensive literature review and tested with 12 building case studies in the major European climate zones. The framework outlines five different dimensions (improving mental and physical health, designed for human needs, sustainably built and managed, resilient and adaptive, empowering people), including 24 indicators and sub-indicators. The validation of the framework revealed that it is possible to assess different building projects against different indicators under each dimension. However, challenges remain due to issues such as lack of time, cost of data collection, or lack of documentation. The developed framework provides a balanced approach that promotes both individual well-being and broader sustainability goals. It provides necessary guidance to inform practitioners and policy makers as well as other building sector stakeholders to integrate healthy buildings thinking into their project development, assessment, and decision making.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 324
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR), Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BE), Danmarks Nationalbank (DK), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Green Space and Health
3.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.