Tradeoffs and synergies between social equity and environmental benefits in conservation

Conservation programs worldwide pursue social equity alongside environmental benefits and economic efficiency. When the spatial patterning of human diversity differs from the patterning of biological diversity, conservation planners face complex tradeoffs between social and biological objectives. Here, we quantify how these tradeoffs depend on the correlation between the spatial distributions of social and biological diversity. We used empirical patterns in the commonness and rarity of species to generate simulated landscapes with pre-defined correlations between biological diversity and human social diversity. Our analysis shows how tradeoffs between social equity and environmental benefits are unavoidable when human and biological diversity are negatively correlated. However, when human and biological diversity are strongly positively correlated, then biological and social priorities are congruent. In these settings, well-designed conservation programs may engender positive feedbacks between social equity and ecosystem services, enhancing both. Our analysis focused on distributional equity, but similar dynamics are likely to occur with procedural, recognitional and contextual equity. Given growing evidence that socially equitable conservation programs are more likely to be successful, our findings underscore the importance of carefully assessing the potential for conflicts and synergies between the social and biological goals of conservation programs.