What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials

While effective bureaucracy is crucial for state capacity, its decision-making remains a black box. We elicit preferences of 900+ real-world public procurement officials in Finland and Germany. This is an important pursuit as they report having sizeable discretion and minimal extrinsic incentives. Through conjoint experiments, we identify the relative importance of multiple features of procurement outcomes. Officials prioritize avoiding unexpectedly high prices over seeking low prices. Avoiding winners with prior bad performance is the most important feature. Officials avoid very low competition, while litigation risks and regional favoritism matter less. Preferences and office interests appear well-aligned among bureaucrats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106716
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials

Albrecht Bohne, Ari Luukinen, Leonardo Maria Giuffrida, Janne Tukiainen et al.
8 citations
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Auction Theory and Applications
3.92
article

What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials

Albrecht Bohne, Ari Luukinen, Leonardo Maria Giuffrida, Janne Tukiainen, Jan Jääskeläinen, Sebastian Blesse, Antti Sieppi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

While effective bureaucracy is crucial for state capacity, its decision-making remains a black box. We elicit preferences of 900+ real-world public procurement officials in Finland and Germany. This is an important pursuit as they report having sizeable discretion and minimal extrinsic incentives. Through conjoint experiments, we identify the relative importance of multiple features of procurement outcomes. Officials prioritize avoiding unexpectedly high prices over seeking low prices. Avoiding winners with prior bad performance is the most important feature. Officials avoid very low competition, while litigation risks and regional favoritism matter less. Preferences and office interests appear well-aligned among bureaucrats.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 227
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Turku (FI), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), Economie Publique (FR), Finnish Transport Agency (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Auction Theory and Applications
3.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials — Albrecht Bohne, Ari Luukinen, et al. · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS