Nature of Cation‐π Interaction in Mono‐ and Inverted Sandwich Ga(I) Complexes. Insights Into the Ga(I)‐π Features and NMR Patterns from GaCp, GaCp*, [Ga <sub>2</sub> Cp] <sup>+</sup> , and [Ga <sub>2</sub> Cp*] <sup>+</sup>

Abstract Cation‐π interactions involve different metallic cations, where the bonding characteristics depend on the involved species. Here, we unravel the interaction nature features for Ga(I)‐π interactions, where different contributing terms ensure an efficient coordination of one and two Ga(I)‐atoms towards a common aromatic ring. Our results show a more balanced contribution of about ~70 % from electrostatic character and of ~30 % from orbital interaction for the prototypical GaCp, GaCp*, [Ga 2 Cp] + and [Ga 2 Cp*] + species. Such description strongly contrasts with the highly electrostatic character in alkali and alkaline‐earth metals counterparts. The variation from mono to inverted sandwich complexes leads to a decrease in the interaction energy from −180.9 to −148.1 kcal/mol for Cp based species, and from −184.4 to −155.5 kcal/mol in Cp* counterparts, owing to a decrease in both electrostatic and orbital stabilizing contributions. Thus, the aromatic rings exhibit coordination versatility towards one or two Ga(I) cations, retaining a sizable stabilization of the Ga(I)‐π interaction. Thus, cation‐π interactions are able to exhibit different types according to the involved metal cation, which relies on a more electrostatic/orbital balanced interaction, which serves to evaluate further mono and inverted sandwich complexes sharing a common aromatic ring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202400400
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature of Cation‐π Interaction in Mono‐ and Inverted Sandwich Ga(I) Complexes. Insights Into the Ga(I)‐π Features and NMR Patterns from GaCp, GaCp*, [Ga 2 Cp] + , and [Ga 2 Cp*] +

Peter L. Rodríguez‐Kessler, Alvaro Rafael Muñoz-Castro, Raúl Guajardo‐Maturana
2 citations
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
0.68
article

Nature of Cation‐π Interaction in Mono‐ and Inverted Sandwich Ga(I) Complexes. Insights Into the Ga(I)‐π Features and NMR Patterns from GaCp, GaCp*, [Ga 2 Cp] + , and [Ga 2 Cp*] +

Peter L. Rodríguez‐Kessler, Alvaro Rafael Muñoz-Castro, Raúl Guajardo‐Maturana
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cation‐π interactions involve different metallic cations, where the bonding characteristics depend on the involved species. Here, we unravel the interaction nature features for Ga(I)‐π interactions, where different contributing terms ensure an efficient coordination of one and two Ga(I)‐atoms towards a common aromatic ring. Our results show a more balanced contribution of about ~70 % from electrostatic character and of ~30 % from orbital interaction for the prototypical GaCp, GaCp*, [Ga 2 Cp] + and [Ga 2 Cp*] + species. Such description strongly contrasts with the highly electrostatic character in alkali and alkaline‐earth metals counterparts. The variation from mono to inverted sandwich complexes leads to a decrease in the interaction energy from −180.9 to −148.1 kcal/mol for Cp based species, and from −184.4 to −155.5 kcal/mol in Cp* counterparts, owing to a decrease in both electrostatic and orbital stabilizing contributions. Thus, the aromatic rings exhibit coordination versatility towards one or two Ga(I) cations, retaining a sizable stabilization of the Ga(I)‐π interaction. Thus, cation‐π interactions are able to exhibit different types according to the involved metal cation, which relies on a more electrostatic/orbital balanced interaction, which serves to evaluate further mono and inverted sandwich complexes sharing a common aromatic ring.

European Journal of Inorganic ChemistryVol. 27(34)
Centro de Investigaciones en Optica (MX), San Sebastián University (CL), Universidad SEK (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.