Systematic decision frameworks for the socially responsible use of precision medicine

Deep learning techniques and whole-genome sequencing promise to increase well-being but also risk perpetuating psychological essentialism, potentially justifying inequality. In this Comment, we offer two much-needed systematic frameworks for clinicians and researchers to avoid essentialist inferences and unfair treatment: (1) a data-driven method for detecting causal fairness in precision health and (2) an ethical framework for determining when it is morally permissible to use racial classifications in population health research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Genomic Medicine
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-024-00433-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic decision frameworks for the socially responsible use of precision medicine

Ian Shane Peebles, Emily Foster‐Hanson, David Kinney
1 citations
npj Genomic Medicine
Race, Genetics, and Society
0.55
article

Systematic decision frameworks for the socially responsible use of precision medicine

Ian Shane Peebles, Emily Foster‐Hanson, David Kinney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep learning techniques and whole-genome sequencing promise to increase well-being but also risk perpetuating psychological essentialism, potentially justifying inequality. In this Comment, we offer two much-needed systematic frameworks for clinicians and researchers to avoid essentialist inferences and unfair treatment: (1) a data-driven method for detecting causal fairness in precision health and (2) an ethical framework for determining when it is morally permissible to use racial classifications in population health research.

npj Genomic MedicineVol. 9(1)
Swarthmore College (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Arizona State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Race, Genetics, and Society
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.