Systematic decision frameworks for the socially responsible use of precision medicine
Deep learning techniques and whole-genome sequencing promise to increase well-being but also risk perpetuating psychological essentialism, potentially justifying inequality. In this Comment, we offer two much-needed systematic frameworks for clinicians and researchers to avoid essentialist inferences and unfair treatment: (1) a data-driven method for detecting causal fairness in precision health and (2) an ethical framework for determining when it is morally permissible to use racial classifications in population health research.
Authors
- Ian Shane Peebles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4759-1149)
- Emily Foster‐Hanson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0963-3934)
- David Kinney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-9887)
Institutions
- Swarthmore College (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Genomic Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-024-00433-9
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Race, Genetics, and Society
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.55