From FOSS to profit: Digital spatial technologies and the mode of production

Existing literature has scrutinized the impact of geospatial technologies from various angles. This article adopts a heterodox vantage point—the mode of production—to illuminate the intricate power dynamics woven into the fabric of these technologies. By focusing on the mode of production, we meticulously demonstrate how ostensibly novel digital technologies and geospatial data formats wield power within social relations of production. Responding to calls to scrutinize the political economy of spatial technologies and map-making tools, we aim to unravel the underpinning social relations, software development techniques, and technologies that shape file formats like GeoJSON and Esri Shapefile. By tracing the historical evolution of these formats, the article reveals how digital labor, both voluntary and expropriated, shapes the landscapes of profit-driven technology firms. The rise of open standards is not a departure from for-profit motives but rather a manifestation of the confluence of free, open, and for-profit. Ultimately, we argue that the intricate connections between digital technologies, geography, and capitalist structures enroll seemingly independent FOSS products into broader systems of capital accumulation. These findings highlight the far-reaching impact of geospatial technologies and their role in perpetuating and reshaping capitalist dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Geography and Society
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100101
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From FOSS to profit: Digital spatial technologies and the mode of production

David O’Sullivan, Laura Beltz Imaoka, Dillon Mahmoudi, Jim Thatcher
4 citations
Digital Geography and Society
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
7.83
article

From FOSS to profit: Digital spatial technologies and the mode of production

David O’Sullivan, Laura Beltz Imaoka, Dillon Mahmoudi, Jim Thatcher
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Existing literature has scrutinized the impact of geospatial technologies from various angles. This article adopts a heterodox vantage point—the mode of production—to illuminate the intricate power dynamics woven into the fabric of these technologies. By focusing on the mode of production, we meticulously demonstrate how ostensibly novel digital technologies and geospatial data formats wield power within social relations of production. Responding to calls to scrutinize the political economy of spatial technologies and map-making tools, we aim to unravel the underpinning social relations, software development techniques, and technologies that shape file formats like GeoJSON and Esri Shapefile. By tracing the historical evolution of these formats, the article reveals how digital labor, both voluntary and expropriated, shapes the landscapes of profit-driven technology firms. The rise of open standards is not a departure from for-profit motives but rather a manifestation of the confluence of free, open, and for-profit. Ultimately, we argue that the intricate connections between digital technologies, geography, and capitalist structures enroll seemingly independent FOSS products into broader systems of capital accumulation. These findings highlight the far-reaching impact of geospatial technologies and their role in perpetuating and reshaping capitalist dynamics.

Digital Geography and SocietyVol. 7
Oregon State University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), University of North Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
7.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From FOSS to profit: Digital spatial technologies and the mode of production — David O’Sullivan, Laura Beltz Imaoka, et al. · Digital Geography and Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS