Vegetation density is the main driver of insect species richness and diversity in small private urban front gardens

Urbanisation changes natural ecosystems and vegetation to urban green spaces, and causes insect communities to experience novel challenges for survival. New evidence suggests that urban green spaces, no matter how small, can provide meaningful habitats for insects. Information on design and management of small gardens (<6 m 2 ) in dense urban areas is still scarce. In particular, it is hardly known which garden designs provide most benefits to insects. We surveyed 65 small urban façade gardens (μ=1.7m 2 ) in Amsterdam and The Hague in The Netherlands and measured various garden attributes that are expected to be relevant for general, flower-visiting and herbivorous insect species richness and diversity. Plant coverage and richness were the strongest predictors of insect biodiversity and species richness. We found no support for associations with native plants or garden size. To strengthen insect biodiversity in the urban environment, we recommend future design of urban green spaces to focus on maximising coverage and richness of vegetation. Although there are advantages to using native species, we acknowledge that garden owners often prefer exotic species. Some of these can also affect insect diversity and abundances positively. Shown are either plus or minus signs indicating a positive or negative trends from the models that predict species richness and Shannon biodiversity of insects, pollinators or herbivores by the design of small urban gardens. * indicates a statistically significant trend at p-value < 0.05. A plus or minus sign without * means a visible statistically non-significant trend. A greyed out square indicates exclusion of the term in the model. A white square indicates non-significant and non-visible trend. • Small urban gardens hold large potential for supporting urban insect communities. • Total vegetation cover was the strongest predictor for insect diversity and richness. • Plant richness was the second strongest predictor, but not for herbivorous insects. • Garden size had no effect on insect diversity or richness. • Native plant species did not impact insect diversity or richness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128531
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vegetation density is the main driver of insect species richness and diversity in small private urban front gardens

Roy P. Remme, J. Gerard B. Oostermeijer, Joeri Morpurgo, Margot A. Huurdeman
12 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Plant and animal studies
12.35
article

Vegetation density is the main driver of insect species richness and diversity in small private urban front gardens

Roy P. Remme, J. Gerard B. Oostermeijer, Joeri Morpurgo, Margot A. Huurdeman
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Urbanisation changes natural ecosystems and vegetation to urban green spaces, and causes insect communities to experience novel challenges for survival. New evidence suggests that urban green spaces, no matter how small, can provide meaningful habitats for insects. Information on design and management of small gardens (<6 m 2 ) in dense urban areas is still scarce. In particular, it is hardly known which garden designs provide most benefits to insects. We surveyed 65 small urban façade gardens (μ=1.7m 2 ) in Amsterdam and The Hague in The Netherlands and measured various garden attributes that are expected to be relevant for general, flower-visiting and herbivorous insect species richness and diversity. Plant coverage and richness were the strongest predictors of insect biodiversity and species richness. We found no support for associations with native plants or garden size. To strengthen insect biodiversity in the urban environment, we recommend future design of urban green spaces to focus on maximising coverage and richness of vegetation. Although there are advantages to using native species, we acknowledge that garden owners often prefer exotic species. Some of these can also affect insect diversity and abundances positively. Shown are either plus or minus signs indicating a positive or negative trends from the models that predict species richness and Shannon biodiversity of insects, pollinators or herbivores by the design of small urban gardens. * indicates a statistically significant trend at p-value < 0.05. A plus or minus sign without * means a visible statistically non-significant trend. A greyed out square indicates exclusion of the term in the model. A white square indicates non-significant and non-visible trend. • Small urban gardens hold large potential for supporting urban insect communities. • Total vegetation cover was the strongest predictor for insect diversity and richness. • Plant richness was the second strongest predictor, but not for herbivorous insects. • Garden size had no effect on insect diversity or richness. • Native plant species did not impact insect diversity or richness.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 101
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Institute for Biodiversity (DE)
Impact Fund, Universiteit Leiden, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant and animal studies
12.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.