Combinatorial innovation and lifecycle analysis of low-carbon energy technologies in China

• The study integrates combinatorial innovation theories with lifecycle analysis of low-carbon energy technologies. • The study identifies different trends of technology paradigms and their evolution. • Lagging regions should seize the opportunity during paradigm shifts. Measuring the lifecycle of low-carbon energy technologies is critical to better understanding the innovation pattern. However, previous studies on lifecycle either focus on technical details or just provide a general overview, due to the lack of connection with innovation theories. This article attempts to fill this gap by analyzing the lifecycle from a combinatorial innovation perspective, based on patent data of ten low-carbon energy technologies in China from 1999 to 2018. The problem of estimating lifecycle stages can be transformed into analyzing the rise and fall of knowledge combinations. By building the international patent classification (IPC) co-occurrence matrix, this paper demonstrates the lifecycle evolution of technologies and develops an efficient quantitative index to define lifecycle stages. The mathematical measurement can effectively reflect the evolutionary pattern of technologies. Additionally, this article relates the macro evolution of lifecycle to the micro dynamic mechanism of technology paradigms. The sign of technology maturity is that new inventions tend to follow the patterns established by prior ones. Following this logic, this paper identifies different trends of paradigms in each technology field and analyze their transition. Furthermore, catching-up literature shows that drastic transformation of technology paradigms may open “windows of opportunity” for laggard regions. From the results of this paper, it is clear to see that latecomers can catch up with pioneers especially when there is a radical change in paradigms. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to capture such opportunities during the technology lifecycle and coordinate regional innovation resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geography and sustainability
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2024.08.013
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combinatorial innovation and lifecycle analysis of low-carbon energy technologies in China

Shengjun Zhu, Zerun Jin
2 citations
Geography and sustainability
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
0.70
article

Combinatorial innovation and lifecycle analysis of low-carbon energy technologies in China

Shengjun Zhu, Zerun Jin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• The study integrates combinatorial innovation theories with lifecycle analysis of low-carbon energy technologies. • The study identifies different trends of technology paradigms and their evolution. • Lagging regions should seize the opportunity during paradigm shifts. Measuring the lifecycle of low-carbon energy technologies is critical to better understanding the innovation pattern. However, previous studies on lifecycle either focus on technical details or just provide a general overview, due to the lack of connection with innovation theories. This article attempts to fill this gap by analyzing the lifecycle from a combinatorial innovation perspective, based on patent data of ten low-carbon energy technologies in China from 1999 to 2018. The problem of estimating lifecycle stages can be transformed into analyzing the rise and fall of knowledge combinations. By building the international patent classification (IPC) co-occurrence matrix, this paper demonstrates the lifecycle evolution of technologies and develops an efficient quantitative index to define lifecycle stages. The mathematical measurement can effectively reflect the evolutionary pattern of technologies. Additionally, this article relates the macro evolution of lifecycle to the micro dynamic mechanism of technology paradigms. The sign of technology maturity is that new inventions tend to follow the patterns established by prior ones. Following this logic, this paper identifies different trends of paradigms in each technology field and analyze their transition. Furthermore, catching-up literature shows that drastic transformation of technology paradigms may open “windows of opportunity” for laggard regions. From the results of this paper, it is clear to see that latecomers can catch up with pioneers especially when there is a radical change in paradigms. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to capture such opportunities during the technology lifecycle and coordinate regional innovation resources.

Geography and sustainabilityVol. 6(2)
Peking University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.