Early Discourse on the Legal Protection of Photography: Focusing on the Fine Art Copyright Act in U.K. (1862)

The Fine Art Copyright Act in U.K. (1862) is the first law in the world to provide copyright protection for photographs. The discourse that emerged in the process of establishing photography as a subject of legal protection under copyright can be categorized into three main strands. First, it was argued that photographs were produced by mechanical labor through a mechanical process and should be excluded from protection. Second, photographs are the product of “mental labor” and should be protected in the same way as artistic works such as paintings. Third, it is argued that photographs should be protected by copyright because certain resources (labor, capital, etc.) are used in their production. In the end, the 1862 Act protects paintings, drawings, and photographs in essentially the same way, with the difference that paintings and drawings are protected up to their “design,” whereas photographs are protected only in their work and negative form. The historical experience of how photography entered the copyright system may be helpful in resolving the copyright issues surrounding generative AI.

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Copyright Commission
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30582/kdps.2024.37.3.101
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Discourse on the Legal Protection of Photography: Focusing on the Fine Art Copyright Act in U.K. (1862)

Korea Copyright Commission
Law in Society and Culture
article

Early Discourse on the Legal Protection of Photography: Focusing on the Fine Art Copyright Act in U.K. (1862)

article en

Abstract

The Fine Art Copyright Act in U.K. (1862) is the first law in the world to provide copyright protection for photographs. The discourse that emerged in the process of establishing photography as a subject of legal protection under copyright can be categorized into three main strands. First, it was argued that photographs were produced by mechanical labor through a mechanical process and should be excluded from protection. Second, photographs are the product of “mental labor” and should be protected in the same way as artistic works such as paintings. Third, it is argued that photographs should be protected by copyright because certain resources (labor, capital, etc.) are used in their production. In the end, the 1862 Act protects paintings, drawings, and photographs in essentially the same way, with the difference that paintings and drawings are protected up to their “design,” whereas photographs are protected only in their work and negative form. The historical experience of how photography entered the copyright system may be helpful in resolving the copyright issues surrounding generative AI.

Korea Copyright CommissionVol. 147
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.