Speculation fit for a king? Medical announcements from the British royal family and the recurring ethical complexities of personal privacy and public commentary from physicians
This article explores the ethical complexities of openly-expressed medical commentary using recent cancer diagnoses within the British monarchy as illustrative cases. Specifically, it examines tensions between public interest, personal privacy, and professional standards, underlining the adverse implications of conjectural discourse, alongside the role of physicians in enhancing wider medical understanding.
Authors
- Alexander Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-5684)
- Michael Liebrenz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8040-2744)
- Dinesh Bhugra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-2480)
- Antonio Ventriglio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-7007)
Institutions
- University of Foggia (IT)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- King's College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2024-10-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.22