Green Beta: Comparison of Green and Non-Green Stocks Based on Downside Risk

The study offers an innovative technique for diversifying the downside risk by selecting green stocks for investments. Investors fancy green stocks due to their ability of generating sustainable returns. Pursuing such arguments, this study provides a comparative analysis of green and non-green stocks to measure whether green stocks help investors secure their investments during the downward movement of the market, by applying multivariate regression after collecting the data for stocks listed at AIM over the period of 2012 to 2020. The findings of the study prove that green stocks reduce the downside risk as compared to non-green stocks and compensate investors by providing them sustainable returns for holding the stocks with negative returns. However, non-green stocks also have a strong association with downside risk but have less effect on downside risk than green stocks. The study has strong implications for investors who are searching for new exotic asset classes to reduce the risk and improve the returns, particularly during downward recessions of the market.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Development and Social Sciences
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-iii)11
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Beta: Comparison of Green and Non-Green Stocks Based on Downside Risk

Journal of Development and Social Sciences
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Green Beta: Comparison of Green and Non-Green Stocks Based on Downside Risk

article en

Abstract

The study offers an innovative technique for diversifying the downside risk by selecting green stocks for investments. Investors fancy green stocks due to their ability of generating sustainable returns. Pursuing such arguments, this study provides a comparative analysis of green and non-green stocks to measure whether green stocks help investors secure their investments during the downward movement of the market, by applying multivariate regression after collecting the data for stocks listed at AIM over the period of 2012 to 2020. The findings of the study prove that green stocks reduce the downside risk as compared to non-green stocks and compensate investors by providing them sustainable returns for holding the stocks with negative returns. However, non-green stocks also have a strong association with downside risk but have less effect on downside risk than green stocks. The study has strong implications for investors who are searching for new exotic asset classes to reduce the risk and improve the returns, particularly during downward recessions of the market.

Journal of Development and Social SciencesVol. 5(III)
National University of Modern Languages (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Green Beta: Comparison of Green and Non-Green Stocks Based on Downside Risk · Journal of Development and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS