A method for evaluating sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in Idaho streams

Human activities can increase sediment delivery to streams, changing the composition, distribution, and abundance of stream aquatic life. Few U.S. states have numeric water quality standards for streambed sediment under the Clean Water Act, so managers often need to develop local application-specific benchmarks. This study developed stream surface fine sediment <2 mm (sand and fines, SF) and macroinvertebrate fine sediment biotic index (FSBI) benchmarks and an application framework to test for sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in 1<sup>st</sup>-4<sup>th</sup> order Idaho streams. FSBI reference benchmarks were calculated as the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile FSBI value among reference sites within three ecoregion-based site classes. Two approaches were used to develop SF benchmarks. Quantile regression was used to define reach-specific SF benchmarks representing an upper bound value expected under reference conditions. In addition, logistic regression was used to predict SF values with 50% and 75% probability that FSBI is worse than reference within each stream order and site class. The strength of association between SF benchmarks and macroinvertebrate community condition was evaluated by calculating relative risk using multiple datasets and examining responses of multiple macroinvertebrate indicators to SF benchmark status. SF reference benchmarks generally had stronger associations with poor macroinvertebrate condition than SF stressor-response benchmarks. Across datasets and macroinvertebrate indicators, poor macroinvertebrate condition was 1.8-3 times more likely when SF reference benchmarks were exceeded than when achieved. We propose rating the strength of evidence for a surface fine sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition change at the sample event scale as 'unlikely' if both SF and FSBI reference benchmarks are achieved, having 'mixed evidence' if only one reference benchmark is achieved, and 'likely' if both reference benchmarks are not achieved. We recommend combining ratings with other relevant data in a weight-of-evidence approach to assess if sediment impairs aquatic life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18060
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A method for evaluating sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in Idaho streams

James Efta, Jason Williams
2 citations
PeerJ
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
0.92
article

A method for evaluating sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in Idaho streams

James Efta, Jason Williams
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Human activities can increase sediment delivery to streams, changing the composition, distribution, and abundance of stream aquatic life. Few U.S. states have numeric water quality standards for streambed sediment under the Clean Water Act, so managers often need to develop local application-specific benchmarks. This study developed stream surface fine sediment <2 mm (sand and fines, SF) and macroinvertebrate fine sediment biotic index (FSBI) benchmarks and an application framework to test for sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition changes in 1<sup>st</sup>-4<sup>th</sup> order Idaho streams. FSBI reference benchmarks were calculated as the 25<sup>th</sup> percentile FSBI value among reference sites within three ecoregion-based site classes. Two approaches were used to develop SF benchmarks. Quantile regression was used to define reach-specific SF benchmarks representing an upper bound value expected under reference conditions. In addition, logistic regression was used to predict SF values with 50% and 75% probability that FSBI is worse than reference within each stream order and site class. The strength of association between SF benchmarks and macroinvertebrate community condition was evaluated by calculating relative risk using multiple datasets and examining responses of multiple macroinvertebrate indicators to SF benchmark status. SF reference benchmarks generally had stronger associations with poor macroinvertebrate condition than SF stressor-response benchmarks. Across datasets and macroinvertebrate indicators, poor macroinvertebrate condition was 1.8-3 times more likely when SF reference benchmarks were exceeded than when achieved. We propose rating the strength of evidence for a surface fine sediment-induced macroinvertebrate community composition change at the sample event scale as 'unlikely' if both SF and FSBI reference benchmarks are achieved, having 'mixed evidence' if only one reference benchmark is achieved, and 'likely' if both reference benchmarks are not achieved. We recommend combining ratings with other relevant data in a weight-of-evidence approach to assess if sediment impairs aquatic life.

PeerJVol. 12
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (US)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.