Knowledge co-production for identifying indicators and prioritising solutions for food and land system sustainability in Australia

Abstract Achieving sustainable Australian food and land systems requires the rapid implementation and scaling up of a broad suite of solutions to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Decision-making frameworks are needed to identify suitable indicators and prioritise solutions at national scales to inform sustainability transitions. Using a knowledge co-production framework, we convened 150 stakeholders from 100 + organisations to identify 18 nationally relevant indicators that aligned with critical SDGs describing a sustainable food and land system for Australia, in addition to 78 key solutions (supply- and demand-side) to enable progress against these indicators. We then asked subject matter experts to code the impact of each solution on each indicator using an adapted interaction mapping method accounting for uncertainty. The solution category ‘Protecting and restoring nature’, which included solutions targeting conservation and restoration, showed the highest potential for capturing synergies and avoiding trade-offs across multiple indicators. This category exhibited 34.6% of total major synergies, supporting the achievement of clean water and sanitation (SDG6), economic growth (SDG12), life under water (SDG14), and life on land (SDG15). The solution category ‘Carbon sequestration’, which included technological and biological carbon dioxide removal solutions, had the highest number of trade-offs with individual sustainability indicators (42.3%), particularly those relating to zero hunger (SDG2), wellbeing (SDG3), SDG6, SDG14, and SDG15. Our framework can be used to inform future research investment, support the prioritisation of solutions for quantitative modelling, and inform discussions with stakeholders and policymakers for transforming national-scale food and land systems in alignment with the SDGs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01574-7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge co-production for identifying indicators and prioritising solutions for food and land system sustainability in Australia

Lei Gao, Michalis Hadjikakou, Timothy Reeves, Mark Lawrence et al.
5 citations
Sustainability Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
2.29
article

Knowledge co-production for identifying indicators and prioritising solutions for food and land system sustainability in Australia

Lei Gao, Michalis Hadjikakou, Timothy Reeves, Mark Lawrence, Stephanie J. Watts‐Williams, Matthew Pryor, Romy Zyngier, Lauren T. Bennett, Carla L. Archibald, Ulrika Lindholm, Enayat A. Moallemi, Mark Ellıott, Brett A. Bryan, Sam Oakden, Gary Gale, Haley Lambert, Jane Hutchinson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Achieving sustainable Australian food and land systems requires the rapid implementation and scaling up of a broad suite of solutions to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Decision-making frameworks are needed to identify suitable indicators and prioritise solutions at national scales to inform sustainability transitions. Using a knowledge co-production framework, we convened 150 stakeholders from 100 + organisations to identify 18 nationally relevant indicators that aligned with critical SDGs describing a sustainable food and land system for Australia, in addition to 78 key solutions (supply- and demand-side) to enable progress against these indicators. We then asked subject matter experts to code the impact of each solution on each indicator using an adapted interaction mapping method accounting for uncertainty. The solution category ‘Protecting and restoring nature’, which included solutions targeting conservation and restoration, showed the highest potential for capturing synergies and avoiding trade-offs across multiple indicators. This category exhibited 34.6% of total major synergies, supporting the achievement of clean water and sanitation (SDG6), economic growth (SDG12), life under water (SDG14), and life on land (SDG15). The solution category ‘Carbon sequestration’, which included technological and biological carbon dioxide removal solutions, had the highest number of trade-offs with individual sustainability indicators (42.3%), particularly those relating to zero hunger (SDG2), wellbeing (SDG3), SDG6, SDG14, and SDG15. Our framework can be used to inform future research investment, support the prioritisation of solutions for quantitative modelling, and inform discussions with stakeholders and policymakers for transforming national-scale food and land systems in alignment with the SDGs.

Sustainability ScienceVol. 19(6)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Sydney Adventist Hospital (AU), Parks Victoria (AU), Queens University (BD), Climate Centre (NL), Australian Energy Council (AU), Agriculture and Food (AU), Services Australia (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), Australian Wine Research Institute (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Deakin University
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.