Prevalence of pelvic examinations on anesthetized patients without informed consent
This study demonstrates that although most osteopathic medical students consider performing pelvic examinations on anesthetized patients unethical, many still admit to practicing pelvic examinations on patients under anesthesia, while on OB-GYN rotations for efficiency of practice, lack of policy awareness and personal education, and being in unique positions in which grades are determined by seniors and preceptors for their willingness to do what is asked even if the practice does not align with their conviction. This study highlights the importance of ongoing research and implementation of policies at institutional and state levels that will procure the value of pelvic examinations while protecting and upholding the ethics of patients' rights and autonomy of medical students.
Authors
- Varsha Reddy
- Nicole Neiman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2742-0917)
- David Manna
- Rachel Cutting (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-1097)
- Sneha Polam
Institutions
- Lincoln Memorial University (US)
- New England College (US)
- Touro College (US)
- Nova Southeastern University (US)
- University of New England (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0058
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.54