Trade, Slavery, and State Coercion of Labor: Egypt during the First Globalization Era

Abstract I investigate the effects of trade on labor coercion under the dual-coercive institutions of slavery and state coercion. Employing novel data from Egypt, I document that the cotton boom in 1861–1865 increased both imported slaveholdings of the rural middle class and state coercion of local workers by the elite. As state coercion reduced wage employment, it reinforced the demand for slaves among the rural middle class. While the abolition of slavery in 1877 increased wages, it did not affect state coercion or wage employment. I discuss the political effects of the abolition as a potential explanation for these findings. “The barbarism of the [U.S.] South, while destroying itself, [appeared] in the providence of God to be working out the regeneration of Egypt.” North American Review 98, no. 203 (1864, p. 483), quoted in Earle (1926)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Economic History
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s002205072400038x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade, Slavery, and State Coercion of Labor: Egypt during the First Globalization Era

Mohamed Saleh
8 citations
The Journal of Economic History
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
11.95
article

Trade, Slavery, and State Coercion of Labor: Egypt during the First Globalization Era

Mohamed Saleh
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract I investigate the effects of trade on labor coercion under the dual-coercive institutions of slavery and state coercion. Employing novel data from Egypt, I document that the cotton boom in 1861–1865 increased both imported slaveholdings of the rural middle class and state coercion of local workers by the elite. As state coercion reduced wage employment, it reinforced the demand for slaves among the rural middle class. While the abolition of slavery in 1877 increased wages, it did not affect state coercion or wage employment. I discuss the political effects of the abolition as a potential explanation for these findings. “The barbarism of the [U.S.] South, while destroying itself, [appeared] in the providence of God to be working out the regeneration of Egypt.” North American Review 98, no. 203 (1864, p. 483), quoted in Earle (1926)

The Journal of Economic HistoryVol. 84(4)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
University of Cambridge, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
11.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.