A Study on Plural Form of Japanese Terms for Self and Address Terms

In this study, the plural form of Japanese terms for self and address terms was examined from the perspective of pragmatics, focusing on the speaker's intention to choose. The analysis data were utterances about groups of differences in positions or hostility between groups in order to clearly define how the speaker distinguishes and expresses oneself and the listener group in plural form. As a result, it was confirmed that the use of the high–level or formal plural form did not lead to high deference for the listener. In other words, it could be defined that the speaker tends to use the high–formality plural form as a psychological distance from the listener group or as a motive to show one’s demeanor in the speech in which confrontation between groups appeared. In Japanese, there are various types of terms for self, address terms and plural suffixes, and each expressions has different restrictions on use and differences in deference, so the plural form of terms for self and address terms can be said to show delicate adjustments and choices according to the speaker's attributes and usage restrictions, in addition to the speaker's intentions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Japanese Studies
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31634/cjs.2024.61.103
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Plural Form of Japanese Terms for Self and Address Terms

Hiwee Leng Toh
Comparative Japanese Studies
linguistics and terminology studies
article

A Study on Plural Form of Japanese Terms for Self and Address Terms

Hiwee Leng Toh
article en

Abstract

In this study, the plural form of Japanese terms for self and address terms was examined from the perspective of pragmatics, focusing on the speaker's intention to choose. The analysis data were utterances about groups of differences in positions or hostility between groups in order to clearly define how the speaker distinguishes and expresses oneself and the listener group in plural form. As a result, it was confirmed that the use of the high–level or formal plural form did not lead to high deference for the listener. In other words, it could be defined that the speaker tends to use the high–formality plural form as a psychological distance from the listener group or as a motive to show one’s demeanor in the speech in which confrontation between groups appeared. In Japanese, there are various types of terms for self, address terms and plural suffixes, and each expressions has different restrictions on use and differences in deference, so the plural form of terms for self and address terms can be said to show delicate adjustments and choices according to the speaker's attributes and usage restrictions, in addition to the speaker's intentions.

Comparative Japanese StudiesVol. 61
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.