Types of Case Alternation in the Japanese ‘Ga’ Case Object Construction : The Types where Alternation Occurs on either the Subject or Object

This paper focuses on the types of case alternation in ‘Ga’ case object constructions and examines the types where only one of the subject or object case markers is replaced. To investigate this, we presuppose that ‘Ga’ case object constructions are unaccusative constructions and explain case alternation in relation to the subject's controllability over the matter expressed by the predicate. While the subject is fundamentally not an agent who can control the matter expressed by the predicate in ‘Ga’ case object constructions, the ‘Ni’ case subject demonstrates an even stronger [– controllability] compared to the ‘Ga’ case subject. In contrast, even in ‘Ga’ case object constructions, if the subject is considered to have some degree of [+controllability], it can take an ‘O’ case object. Predicates where only the subject is replaced with the ‘Ni’ case typically express matters such as existence/absence, possibility/difficulty, necessity/importance, and emotion. For these predicates, the subject’s controllability is not recognized, and the subject is regarded as having a more passive semantic role. Predicates where only the object is replaced with the ‘O’ case mainly express emotions such as preference, hope, or desire. This suggests that these emotions are perceived as more controllable compared to other emotions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Japanese Studies
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31634/cjs.2024.61.121
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Types of Case Alternation in the Japanese ‘Ga’ Case Object Construction : The Types where Alternation Occurs on either the Subject or Object

J. Han
Comparative Japanese Studies
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Types of Case Alternation in the Japanese ‘Ga’ Case Object Construction : The Types where Alternation Occurs on either the Subject or Object

J. Han
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on the types of case alternation in ‘Ga’ case object constructions and examines the types where only one of the subject or object case markers is replaced. To investigate this, we presuppose that ‘Ga’ case object constructions are unaccusative constructions and explain case alternation in relation to the subject's controllability over the matter expressed by the predicate. While the subject is fundamentally not an agent who can control the matter expressed by the predicate in ‘Ga’ case object constructions, the ‘Ni’ case subject demonstrates an even stronger [– controllability] compared to the ‘Ga’ case subject. In contrast, even in ‘Ga’ case object constructions, if the subject is considered to have some degree of [+controllability], it can take an ‘O’ case object. Predicates where only the subject is replaced with the ‘Ni’ case typically express matters such as existence/absence, possibility/difficulty, necessity/importance, and emotion. For these predicates, the subject’s controllability is not recognized, and the subject is regarded as having a more passive semantic role. Predicates where only the object is replaced with the ‘O’ case mainly express emotions such as preference, hope, or desire. This suggests that these emotions are perceived as more controllable compared to other emotions.

Comparative Japanese StudiesVol. 61
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.