Audiologists’ sensory integration awareness

Objectives: This study aimed to measure the sensory integration awareness of audiologists working in different fields, how they perceive the effect of hearing loss on sensory processing, and their level of knowledge and education on this subject. Materials and Methods: The observational study included 208 audiologists (62 males, 146 females; mean age: 25.4±3.9 years; range, 21 to 54 years) regardless of their experience between May 2024 and August 2024. Participants were asked about their sex, age, university degree, and city of work, as well as field of work and years of experience. They were then asked to complete a 22-question form about sensory integration issues in individuals with hearing loss. Results: Considering the general level of awareness of sensory integration, 54% of the participants had a low level of knowledge. When the awareness rate was grouped according to the field of work, audiologists working in the field of rehabilitation were the group with the highest awareness rate with a rate of 45.5%. Eighty-nine percent of the participants stated that they did not receive any sensory integration training, but 64% stated that they would like to receive sensory integration training. Conclusion: Considering the perceptual and behavioral benefits of multisensory integration, audiologists have a great responsibility in the development of auditory perception, both in the early detection and intervention of hearing loss and in the field of auditory rehabilitation. Sensory integration training should be included in the undergraduate programs of audiologists. It is also important to include sensory integration therapy in the auditory rehabilitation program for children with hearing loss.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Praxis of Otorhinolaryngology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5606/kbbu.2024.94899
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audiologists’ sensory integration awareness

Banu Baş
Praxis of Otorhinolaryngology
Noise Effects and Management
article

Audiologists’ sensory integration awareness

Banu Baş
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to measure the sensory integration awareness of audiologists working in different fields, how they perceive the effect of hearing loss on sensory processing, and their level of knowledge and education on this subject. Materials and Methods: The observational study included 208 audiologists (62 males, 146 females; mean age: 25.4±3.9 years; range, 21 to 54 years) regardless of their experience between May 2024 and August 2024. Participants were asked about their sex, age, university degree, and city of work, as well as field of work and years of experience. They were then asked to complete a 22-question form about sensory integration issues in individuals with hearing loss. Results: Considering the general level of awareness of sensory integration, 54% of the participants had a low level of knowledge. When the awareness rate was grouped according to the field of work, audiologists working in the field of rehabilitation were the group with the highest awareness rate with a rate of 45.5%. Eighty-nine percent of the participants stated that they did not receive any sensory integration training, but 64% stated that they would like to receive sensory integration training. Conclusion: Considering the perceptual and behavioral benefits of multisensory integration, audiologists have a great responsibility in the development of auditory perception, both in the early detection and intervention of hearing loss and in the field of auditory rehabilitation. Sensory integration training should be included in the undergraduate programs of audiologists. It is also important to include sensory integration therapy in the auditory rehabilitation program for children with hearing loss.

Praxis of OtorhinolaryngologyVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.