A Study of the Multi-Objective Neighboring Only Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem in the Context of Uncertainty

The pursuit of studying the quadratic minimum spanning tree (QMST) problem has captivated numerous academics because of its distinctive characteristic of taking into account the cost of interaction between pairs of edges. A QMST refers to the minimum spanning tree, which is a graph that is both acyclic and minimally connected. It also includes the interaction cost between a pair of edges in the minimum spanning tree. These interaction costs can occur between any pair of edges, whether they are adjacent or non-adjacent. In the QMST problem, our objective is to minimize both the cost of the edges and the cost of interactions. This eventually classifies the task as NP-hard. The interaction costs, sometimes referred to as quadratic costs, inherently exhibit a contradictory relationship with linear edge costs when solving a multi-objective problem that aims to minimize both linear and quadratic costs simultaneously. This study addresses the bi-objective adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (AQMSTP) by incorporating the uncertain nature of the linear and quadratic costs associated with the problem. The focus is on the interaction costs between adjacent edges. Consequently, we have introduced a multi-objective problem called the uncertain adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (mUAQMSTP) and formulated it using the uncertain chance-constrained programming technique. Afterwards, two MOEAs—non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGAII) and duplicate elimination non-dominated sorting evolutionary algorithm (DENSEA)—and the traditional multi-objective solution approach, the global criterion method, are employed to solve the deterministic transformation of the model. Finally, we provide a suitable numerical illustration to substantiate our suggested framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198941
Primary Topic
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of the Multi-Objective Neighboring Only Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem in the Context of Uncertainty

Olegas Prentkovskis, Falguni Chakraborty, Haresh Kumar Sharma, Lijana Maskeliūnaitė et al.
Applied Sciences
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
article

A Study of the Multi-Objective Neighboring Only Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem in the Context of Uncertainty

Olegas Prentkovskis, Falguni Chakraborty, Haresh Kumar Sharma, Lijana Maskeliūnaitė, Debosree Pal
article en

Abstract

The pursuit of studying the quadratic minimum spanning tree (QMST) problem has captivated numerous academics because of its distinctive characteristic of taking into account the cost of interaction between pairs of edges. A QMST refers to the minimum spanning tree, which is a graph that is both acyclic and minimally connected. It also includes the interaction cost between a pair of edges in the minimum spanning tree. These interaction costs can occur between any pair of edges, whether they are adjacent or non-adjacent. In the QMST problem, our objective is to minimize both the cost of the edges and the cost of interactions. This eventually classifies the task as NP-hard. The interaction costs, sometimes referred to as quadratic costs, inherently exhibit a contradictory relationship with linear edge costs when solving a multi-objective problem that aims to minimize both linear and quadratic costs simultaneously. This study addresses the bi-objective adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (AQMSTP) by incorporating the uncertain nature of the linear and quadratic costs associated with the problem. The focus is on the interaction costs between adjacent edges. Consequently, we have introduced a multi-objective problem called the uncertain adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (mUAQMSTP) and formulated it using the uncertain chance-constrained programming technique. Afterwards, two MOEAs—non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGAII) and duplicate elimination non-dominated sorting evolutionary algorithm (DENSEA)—and the traditional multi-objective solution approach, the global criterion method, are employed to solve the deterministic transformation of the model. Finally, we provide a suitable numerical illustration to substantiate our suggested framework.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(19)
Institute of Management Technology (IN), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT), Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.