Thinking through 1492: IR's Historiographic Operation(s) and the Politics of Benchmark Dates

Abstract This Collective Discussion aims to open up space for an international political sociology of the production of historical knowledge that interrogates the politics around benchmark dates and what becomes knowable and unknowable through them. Specifically, it examines 1492 as a historiographical device through which to unpack how the discipline of IR knows history. 1492 presents a relevant case for this interrogation, for it is central for the historical narratives of a variety of approaches. In this sense, the different contributions do not seek to recover an alternative, ‘better’ history of 1492, but rather to explore its politics of knowledge production: what types of histories it makes visible, what types it precludes, and in what way it partakes in the reproduction of specific hierarchies of knowledge and the power structures that operate through them. In doing so, the Collective Discussion makes visible – and thus opens up for discussion – the historiographical operations performed by periodization and benchmark dating in IR, pointing to a way forward for an international political sociology of knowledge production in the discipline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Sociology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olae032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking through 1492: IR's Historiographic Operation(s) and the Politics of Benchmark Dates

Julia Costa López, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan, Atsuko Watanabe, Ayşe Zarakol et al.
3 citations
International Political Sociology
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
31.07
article

Thinking through 1492: IR's Historiographic Operation(s) and the Politics of Benchmark Dates

Julia Costa López, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan, Atsuko Watanabe, Ayşe Zarakol, Adhemar Mercado
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This Collective Discussion aims to open up space for an international political sociology of the production of historical knowledge that interrogates the politics around benchmark dates and what becomes knowable and unknowable through them. Specifically, it examines 1492 as a historiographical device through which to unpack how the discipline of IR knows history. 1492 presents a relevant case for this interrogation, for it is central for the historical narratives of a variety of approaches. In this sense, the different contributions do not seek to recover an alternative, ‘better’ history of 1492, but rather to explore its politics of knowledge production: what types of histories it makes visible, what types it precludes, and in what way it partakes in the reproduction of specific hierarchies of knowledge and the power structures that operate through them. In doing so, the Collective Discussion makes visible – and thus opens up for discussion – the historiographical operations performed by periodization and benchmark dating in IR, pointing to a way forward for an international political sociology of knowledge production in the discipline.

International Political SociologyVol. 18(4)
Kanazawa University (JP), University of Groningen (NL), University of Erfurt (DE), University of Cambridge (GB)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
31.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.