Sparsity comparison of polytopal finite element methods

Abstract In this work we compare crucial parameters for efficiency of different finite element methods for solving partial differential equations on polytopal meshes. We consider the virtual element method (VEM) and different discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods, namely, the Hybrid DG and Trefftz DG methods. The VEM is a conforming method, that can be seen as a generalization of the classic finite element method to arbitrary polytopal meshes. DG methods are non‐conforming methods that offer high flexibility, but also come with high computational costs. Hybridization reduces these costs by introducing additional facet variables, onto which the computational costs can be transferred to. Trefftz DG methods achieve a similar reduction in complexity by selecting a special and smaller set of basis functions on each element. The association of computational costs to different geometrical entities (elements or facets) leads to differences in the performance of these methods on different grid types. This paper aims to compare the dependency of these approaches across different grid configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PAMM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202400150
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sparsity comparison of polytopal finite element methods

Christoph Lehrenfeld, Paul Stocker, Maximilian Zienecker
3 citations
PAMM
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
1.12
article

Sparsity comparison of polytopal finite element methods

Christoph Lehrenfeld, Paul Stocker, Maximilian Zienecker
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this work we compare crucial parameters for efficiency of different finite element methods for solving partial differential equations on polytopal meshes. We consider the virtual element method (VEM) and different discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods, namely, the Hybrid DG and Trefftz DG methods. The VEM is a conforming method, that can be seen as a generalization of the classic finite element method to arbitrary polytopal meshes. DG methods are non‐conforming methods that offer high flexibility, but also come with high computational costs. Hybridization reduces these costs by introducing additional facet variables, onto which the computational costs can be transferred to. Trefftz DG methods achieve a similar reduction in complexity by selecting a special and smaller set of basis functions on each element. The association of computational costs to different geometrical entities (elements or facets) leads to differences in the performance of these methods on different grid types. This paper aims to compare the dependency of these approaches across different grid configurations.

PAMMVol. 24(3)
TU Wien (AT), University of Göttingen (DE)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sparsity comparison of polytopal finite element methods — Christoph Lehrenfeld, Paul Stocker, et al. · PAMM (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS