EVALUATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SENIORITY: A QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS’SENIORITY ON CLINICAL LEARNING IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS OF PAKISTAN

Background: Clinical Clerkship is a uniquely immersive learning experience in hospital settings. During Clerkship years, students interact with a diverse clinical team, varying in age and seniority, ranging from senior Professorial staff to post-graduate residents. This disparateness in teaching experiences provides an exceptionally challenging learning environment. However, not much scientific data is available regarding the effect of this disparity on student perception clinical skill learning. Objective: This study was aimed at evaluating students experience and their perception regarding seniority of teaching faculty and its impact on their learning. Methodology: This study was conducted with Final Year undergraduate medical students of University College of Medicine, The University of Lahore. We used purposive sampling and three focus group discussions were conducted to evaluate students’ perception of their learning experience with senior and junior faculty members, and their suggestions about who should be involved in Clerkship activities was obtained. Late thematic analysis was performed. Reliability, was ensured through member checking and qualitative analysis was performed by two independent researchers. Results.  Students perceived that senior faculty members to be more “knowledgeable, have Practical insight” and provide “Real world relevance” but do exhibit” confirmation bias”, insufficient presence” and cognitive overload. Junior faculty was reported to be more  “student-friendly”, “ensured provision of examination-oriented knowledge”, had “better skill” demonstration but “lacked leadership and managing abilities” resulting in “Poor class control”. Conclusion: Students perceived better learning with junior faculty members especially for Clinical methods, however they perceived that interaction with senior faculty is helpful in familiarization high-stake assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/1wv4rm83
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SENIORITY: A QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS’SENIORITY ON CLINICAL LEARNING IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS OF PAKISTAN

Abeera Fatima, Mahnoor Mukhtar, Khadijah Mukhtar, Saima Batool et al.
Innovations in Medical Education
article

EVALUATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SENIORITY: A QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS’SENIORITY ON CLINICAL LEARNING IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS OF PAKISTAN

Abeera Fatima, Mahnoor Mukhtar, Khadijah Mukhtar, Saima Batool, Prof Dr. Saima Prof Dr. Saima Rafique, Prof. Dr Mahwish Arooj
article en

Abstract

Background: Clinical Clerkship is a uniquely immersive learning experience in hospital settings. During Clerkship years, students interact with a diverse clinical team, varying in age and seniority, ranging from senior Professorial staff to post-graduate residents. This disparateness in teaching experiences provides an exceptionally challenging learning environment. However, not much scientific data is available regarding the effect of this disparity on student perception clinical skill learning. Objective: This study was aimed at evaluating students experience and their perception regarding seniority of teaching faculty and its impact on their learning. Methodology: This study was conducted with Final Year undergraduate medical students of University College of Medicine, The University of Lahore. We used purposive sampling and three focus group discussions were conducted to evaluate students’ perception of their learning experience with senior and junior faculty members, and their suggestions about who should be involved in Clerkship activities was obtained. Late thematic analysis was performed. Reliability, was ensured through member checking and qualitative analysis was performed by two independent researchers. Results.  Students perceived that senior faculty members to be more “knowledgeable, have Practical insight” and provide “Real world relevance” but do exhibit” confirmation bias”, insufficient presence” and cognitive overload. Junior faculty was reported to be more  “student-friendly”, “ensured provision of examination-oriented knowledge”, had “better skill” demonstration but “lacked leadership and managing abilities” resulting in “Poor class control”. Conclusion: Students perceived better learning with junior faculty members especially for Clinical methods, however they perceived that interaction with senior faculty is helpful in familiarization high-stake assessment.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EVALUATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SENIORITY: A QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF TEACHERS’SENIORITY ON CLINICAL LEARNING IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS OF PAKISTAN — Abeera Fatima, Mahnoor Mukhtar, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS