Postoperative Analgesia Of Additives Dexmedetomidine And Nalbuphine With Hyperbaric Ropivacaine For Infraumbilical And Lower Limb Surgeries.

Background:   Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries due to its efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The addition of adjuvants to local anesthetics, such as dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine, aims to enhance analgesic effects and prolong the duration of anesthesia. This study compares the perioperative efficacy and postoperative analgesia of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine when used as additives to hyperbaric ropivacaine for infraumbilical and lower limb surgeries. Methods: In this study, 65 ASA I and II patients aged 18-70 scheduled for lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 µg dexmedetomidine (Group RD) or 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 0.4 mg nalbuphine (Group RN). Spinal anesthesia was administered at the L3-L4 level. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Group RD (dexmedetomidine) demonstrated significantly longer sensory block duration (349.15 minutes vs. 287.34 minutes) and motor block duration (293 minutes vs. 264.06 minutes) compared to Group RN (nalbuphine), with all differences being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia was also extended in Group RD (412.58 minutes vs. 372.06 minutes) (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in age, gender distribution, ASA grades, onset times for sensory and motor blocks, pulse rate, or SpO2 levels between the groups. Complication rates were similar, with no significant difference in the incidence of complications (P = 0.613). Conclusion: Supplementing 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 µg dexmedetomidine significantly enhances the onset time and prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blockade compared to 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 0.4 mg nalbuphine, with both groups showing similar complication rates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v27i3s.2303
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Analgesia Of Additives Dexmedetomidine And Nalbuphine With Hyperbaric Ropivacaine For Infraumbilical And Lower Limb Surgeries.

Anju Avinash Badne
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Postoperative Analgesia Of Additives Dexmedetomidine And Nalbuphine With Hyperbaric Ropivacaine For Infraumbilical And Lower Limb Surgeries.

Anju Avinash Badne
article en

Abstract

Background:   Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries due to its efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The addition of adjuvants to local anesthetics, such as dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine, aims to enhance analgesic effects and prolong the duration of anesthesia. This study compares the perioperative efficacy and postoperative analgesia of dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine when used as additives to hyperbaric ropivacaine for infraumbilical and lower limb surgeries. Methods: In this study, 65 ASA I and II patients aged 18-70 scheduled for lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to receive either 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 µg dexmedetomidine (Group RD) or 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 0.4 mg nalbuphine (Group RN). Spinal anesthesia was administered at the L3-L4 level. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: Group RD (dexmedetomidine) demonstrated significantly longer sensory block duration (349.15 minutes vs. 287.34 minutes) and motor block duration (293 minutes vs. 264.06 minutes) compared to Group RN (nalbuphine), with all differences being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia was also extended in Group RD (412.58 minutes vs. 372.06 minutes) (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in age, gender distribution, ASA grades, onset times for sensory and motor blocks, pulse rate, or SpO2 levels between the groups. Complication rates were similar, with no significant difference in the incidence of complications (P = 0.613). Conclusion: Supplementing 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 µg dexmedetomidine significantly enhances the onset time and prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blockade compared to 3 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine with 0.4 mg nalbuphine, with both groups showing similar complication rates.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.