Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection

Abstract We present a powerful and innovative statistical framework to address key cosmological questions about the universe's fundamental properties, performing Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and model selection. Utilizing this framework, we systematically explore extensions beyond the standard ΛCDM model, considering a varying curvature density parameter Ω K , a spectral index n s = 1 and a varying n run , a constant dark energy equation of state (EOS) w 0 CDM and a time-dependent one w 0 w a CDM. We also assess cosmological data against a varying effective number of neutrino species N eff . Our analysis incorporates data from various combinations of cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the latest Planck PR4 analysis, CMB lensing from Planck 2018, baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the Bicep-KECK 2018 results. We reinforce the standard ΛCDM model statistical preference when combining CMB data with CMB lensing, BAO, and Bicep-KECK 2018 data against the K-ΛCDM model and d n s /d ln k -ΛCDM with a probability > 80%. When evaluating the dark energy EOS, we find that this dataset does not exhibit a strong preference between the standard ΛCDM model and the constant dark energy EOS model w 0 CDM, with a model posterior probability distribution of approximately ≈ 40%:60% in favour of w 0 CDM, while the time-varying dark energy EOS model only holds below 1% probability. We find a similar result also when considering the N eff -ΛCDM model, with a split probability almost 50%-50% from both our datasets. Overall, our application of BMA reveals that including model uncertainty in these cases does not significantly impact the Hubble tension, showcasing BMA's robustness and utility in cosmological model evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/021
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection

Will J. Percival, S. Paradiso, Glen McGee
6 citations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.70
article

Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection

Will J. Percival, S. Paradiso, Glen McGee
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present a powerful and innovative statistical framework to address key cosmological questions about the universe's fundamental properties, performing Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and model selection. Utilizing this framework, we systematically explore extensions beyond the standard ΛCDM model, considering a varying curvature density parameter Ω K , a spectral index n s = 1 and a varying n run , a constant dark energy equation of state (EOS) w 0 CDM and a time-dependent one w 0 w a CDM. We also assess cosmological data against a varying effective number of neutrino species N eff . Our analysis incorporates data from various combinations of cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the latest Planck PR4 analysis, CMB lensing from Planck 2018, baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the Bicep-KECK 2018 results. We reinforce the standard ΛCDM model statistical preference when combining CMB data with CMB lensing, BAO, and Bicep-KECK 2018 data against the K-ΛCDM model and d n s /d ln k -ΛCDM with a probability > 80%. When evaluating the dark energy EOS, we find that this dataset does not exhibit a strong preference between the standard ΛCDM model and the constant dark energy EOS model w 0 CDM, with a model posterior probability distribution of approximately ≈ 40%:60% in favour of w 0 CDM, while the time-varying dark energy EOS model only holds below 1% probability. We find a similar result also when considering the N eff -ΛCDM model, with a split probability almost 50%-50% from both our datasets. Overall, our application of BMA reveals that including model uncertainty in these cases does not significantly impact the Hubble tension, showcasing BMA's robustness and utility in cosmological model evaluation.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2024(10)
University of Waterloo (CA), Perimeter Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection — Will J. Percival, S. Paradiso, et al. · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS