Evaluating Speech Enhancement Systems Through Listening Effort

Understanding degraded speech is demanding, requiring increased listening effort (LE). Evaluating processed and unprocessed speech with respect to LE can objectively indicate if speech enhancement systems benefit listeners. However, existing methods for measuring LE are complex and not widely applicable. In this study, we propose a simple method to evaluate speech intelligibility and LE simultaneously without additional strain on subjects or operators. We assess this method using results from two independent studies in Norway and Denmark, testing 76 (50+26) subjects across 9 (6+3) processing conditions. Despite differences in evaluation setups, subject recruitment, and processing systems, trends are strikingly similar, demonstrating the proposed method’s robustness and ease of implementation into existing practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iwaenc61483.2024.10694613
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Speech Enhancement Systems Through Listening Effort

Femke B. Gelderblom, Iván López‐Espejo, Tron Vedul Tronstad
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Evaluating Speech Enhancement Systems Through Listening Effort

Femke B. Gelderblom, Iván López‐Espejo, Tron Vedul Tronstad
article en

Abstract

Understanding degraded speech is demanding, requiring increased listening effort (LE). Evaluating processed and unprocessed speech with respect to LE can objectively indicate if speech enhancement systems benefit listeners. However, existing methods for measuring LE are complex and not widely applicable. In this study, we propose a simple method to evaluate speech intelligibility and LE simultaneously without additional strain on subjects or operators. We assess this method using results from two independent studies in Norway and Denmark, testing 76 (50+26) subjects across 9 (6+3) processing conditions. Despite differences in evaluation setups, subject recruitment, and processing systems, trends are strikingly similar, demonstrating the proposed method’s robustness and ease of implementation into existing practices.

Universidad de Granada (ES), SINTEF (NO), SINTEF Digital
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Speech Enhancement Systems Through Listening Effort — Femke B. Gelderblom, Iván López‐Espejo, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS