Evaluation of Objective Quality Models on Neural Audio Codecs

With the emergence of neural audio codecs and new objective quality models based on machine learning, there is a need to clarify which models predict accurately the perceptual quality of coded speech. In this paper, we consider a selected sub-set of ten objective quality models; we present a correlation analysis based on test results from a P.800 ACR experiment on clean speech, assessing the quality of neural speech/audio codecs – traditional codecs (EVS, Opus) are also included as yardsticks. The evaluation is limited to signal-based models for listening-only quality. Overall results per condition are analyzed in terms of Pearson’s correlation, Kendall’s Tau and root mean squared error (RMSE); objective scores per codec are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iwaenc61483.2024.10694655
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Objective Quality Models on Neural Audio Codecs

Thomas Müller, Stéphane Ragot, Vincent Barriac, Pascal Scalart
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Evaluation of Objective Quality Models on Neural Audio Codecs

Thomas Müller, Stéphane Ragot, Vincent Barriac, Pascal Scalart
article en

Abstract

With the emergence of neural audio codecs and new objective quality models based on machine learning, there is a need to clarify which models predict accurately the perceptual quality of coded speech. In this paper, we consider a selected sub-set of ten objective quality models; we present a correlation analysis based on test results from a P.800 ACR experiment on clean speech, assessing the quality of neural speech/audio codecs – traditional codecs (EVS, Opus) are also included as yardsticks. The evaluation is limited to signal-based models for listening-only quality. Overall results per condition are analyzed in terms of Pearson’s correlation, Kendall’s Tau and root mean squared error (RMSE); objective scores per codec are also discussed.

Orange (France) (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Orange
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.