Comparative Analysis of FCN and U-Net for Retinal Blood Vessels Segmentation: A Performance Evaluation

Accurate retinal blood vessels segmentation is essential for early detection and diagnosis of several diseases. This study presents a comparative analysis between U-Net and FCN for retinal blood vessel segmentation. The aim is to assess their performance across four key metrics: sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and specificity, alongside training time. The analysis revealed differences in performance between the two models in terms of segmentation quality and efficiency. U-Net consistently outperforms FCN in terms of accuracy and precision, showcasing its detailed understanding of vessel characteristics and superior segmentation performance. However, FCN demonstrates competitive accuracy and specificity, and shorter training time, suggesting its utility in situations prioritizing computational efficiency.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/rusautocon61949.2024.10694438
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of FCN and U-Net for Retinal Blood Vessels Segmentation: A Performance Evaluation

M. K. Arabov, Anis Amirouche
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Comparative Analysis of FCN and U-Net for Retinal Blood Vessels Segmentation: A Performance Evaluation

M. K. Arabov, Anis Amirouche
article en

Abstract

Accurate retinal blood vessels segmentation is essential for early detection and diagnosis of several diseases. This study presents a comparative analysis between U-Net and FCN for retinal blood vessel segmentation. The aim is to assess their performance across four key metrics: sensitivity, accuracy, precision, and specificity, alongside training time. The analysis revealed differences in performance between the two models in terms of segmentation quality and efficiency. U-Net consistently outperforms FCN in terms of accuracy and precision, showcasing its detailed understanding of vessel characteristics and superior segmentation performance. However, FCN demonstrates competitive accuracy and specificity, and shorter training time, suggesting its utility in situations prioritizing computational efficiency.

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.