Link-Level Performance Comparison of Measurements and Indoor Channel Models at 26GHz

In this paper, we compare the link-level performance of measurement-based channel models and existing channel models for indoor scenarios at 26 GHz. Path loss and power delay profile (PDP) measurements were used to create the measurement-based channel models. The comparison is based on the results of simulations that use the tapped delay line (TDL)-based channel models. We found that the existing models yield good approximations for simpler scenarios, such as a line-of-sight (LOS) transmission along a hallway or a transmission with an obstacle between the transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx), However, the models fail to adequately predict the channel performance when a more complex scenario, i. e., another Tx in adjacent room, is considered. Furthermore, the difference between co-and cross-polarization is highlighted, with co-polarization demonstrating favorable channel characteristics. Our results demonstrate the need for more advanced channel models that consider the polarization and can accurately account for the additional losses incurred by the indoor environment, e. g., the additional attenuation of transmission through the walls.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/elmar62909.2024.10693950
Primary Topic
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Link-Level Performance Comparison of Measurements and Indoor Channel Models at 26GHz

Mariam Mussbah, Markus Rupp, Philipp Svoboda, Adam Blagojevic
1 links
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
article

Link-Level Performance Comparison of Measurements and Indoor Channel Models at 26GHz

Mariam Mussbah, Markus Rupp, Philipp Svoboda, Adam Blagojevic
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the link-level performance of measurement-based channel models and existing channel models for indoor scenarios at 26 GHz. Path loss and power delay profile (PDP) measurements were used to create the measurement-based channel models. The comparison is based on the results of simulations that use the tapped delay line (TDL)-based channel models. We found that the existing models yield good approximations for simpler scenarios, such as a line-of-sight (LOS) transmission along a hallway or a transmission with an obstacle between the transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx), However, the models fail to adequately predict the channel performance when a more complex scenario, i. e., another Tx in adjacent room, is considered. Furthermore, the difference between co-and cross-polarization is highlighted, with co-polarization demonstrating favorable channel characteristics. Our results demonstrate the need for more advanced channel models that consider the polarization and can accurately account for the additional losses incurred by the indoor environment, e. g., the additional attenuation of transmission through the walls.

Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.