Critical Near-Field Impedance Matrices

We investigate the theoretical impedance equations for several near-field antenna positions. In the standard model one computes the currents at the antennas for given voltages using the impedance matrix of the antennas, which is only possible if the determinant of the impedance matrix is non-zero. We consider Hertzian group antennas, and two approximations (mid and far) of the corresponding relative impedance and show that for many situations the determinant is zero. We find three antenna configurations for three antennas, i.e., on a line, on a right triangle, and an isosceles triangle, which result in a zero determinant of the impedance for the far-field approximation. This means that with existing methods, one cannot determine the behavior of this antenna system. For the better mid approximation, we find a configuration of 15 triangular-positioned antennas resulting in a singular impedance matrix. These findings show that the usage of approximate Hertz models is not viable for the analysis of the antenna behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/elmar62909.2024.10694176
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Near-Field Impedance Matrices

Christian Schindelhauer, Peter Krämer
1 citations
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
1.30
article

Critical Near-Field Impedance Matrices

Christian Schindelhauer, Peter Krämer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigate the theoretical impedance equations for several near-field antenna positions. In the standard model one computes the currents at the antennas for given voltages using the impedance matrix of the antennas, which is only possible if the determinant of the impedance matrix is non-zero. We consider Hertzian group antennas, and two approximations (mid and far) of the corresponding relative impedance and show that for many situations the determinant is zero. We find three antenna configurations for three antennas, i.e., on a line, on a right triangle, and an isosceles triangle, which result in a zero determinant of the impedance for the far-field approximation. This means that with existing methods, one cannot determine the behavior of this antenna system. For the better mid approximation, we find a configuration of 15 triangular-positioned antennas resulting in a singular impedance matrix. These findings show that the usage of approximate Hertz models is not viable for the analysis of the antenna behavior.

University of Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical Near-Field Impedance Matrices — Christian Schindelhauer, Peter Krämer · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS